Search for: "Mines v. State"
Results 1721 - 1740
of 3,473
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jan 2025, 8:27 am
United States—in which Native Americans are challenging the federal government's plan to destroy a sacred site by turning it into a copper mine. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 8:20 am
Mine had been the only hand in the air, even though there were several other relatively young lawyers in the room. [read post]
18 Mar 2025, 11:56 am
"] A short excerpt from the 9,000-word U.S. v. [read post]
30 Dec 2016, 1:27 pm
The landowner in Hawkes purchased wetlands in northern Minnesota, seeking to mine them for peat moss used in landscaping. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 6:36 am
The Second Circuit says that "we caution district courts to avoid charging juries to the effect that a plaintiff must show that the employer's stated reason for an adverse action was a 'pretext.'" (Emphasis mine). [read post]
22 Mar 2016, 3:44 pm
Justice Rothstein stated as follows in the CBC v. [read post]
15 Jul 2013, 5:42 pm
Steel Mining Co., LLC v. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 1:24 pm
Ltd v. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 8:52 am
Resources Code, § 21050 et seq.) to a state agency’s proprietary acts with respect to a state-owned and funded rail line or is CEQA not preempted in such circumstances under the market participant doctrine (see Town of Atherton v. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 12:49 am
(Dee v. [read post]
21 Oct 2023, 5:55 am
” Schroeder v. [read post]
30 Dec 2016, 1:27 pm
The landowner in Hawkes purchased wetlands in northern Minnesota, seeking to mine them for peat moss used in landscaping. [read post]
9 Feb 2018, 1:02 pm
(Ticketmaster L.L.C. v. [read post]
25 Feb 2009, 1:57 pm
In United States v. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 10:16 am
Chuck Grassley, who has said he doesn’t support Hurwitz because if a law review article Hurwitz wrote on Roe v. [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 9:05 pm
— Carl V Phillips (@carlvphillips) July 24, 2017 Woo Hoo! [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 11:00 am
As stated in the original article, “general partner” is just another way of saying “generally liable. [read post]
17 Nov 2010, 9:00 pm
Years before Padilla v. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 5:45 pm
In this is the first of two papers planned for mining the 467-cases collected in this study, primary emphasis is placed on investigating the “faithfulness” concern raised by three Justices in the oral arguments in the 3rd iteration of Philip Morris v. [read post]
7 Dec 2018, 5:00 am
I cannot imagine mine is the only household where Christmas “games” include a “guess HM’s first word” competition! [read post]
