Search for: "Owings v. Respondent" Results 1721 - 1740 of 2,317
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Nov 2011, 3:54 am by Kirsten Sjvoll, Matrix Chambers
It was alleged that the Respondents had breached ECHR, art 2 by both failing to carry out a proper investigation into and causing Melanie’s death. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 12:00 pm by admin
Politicians have even included OWS in their personal political agendas, responding both positively and negatively to the political occupation of Zuccotti Park. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 11:54 am by William McGrath
  In the fourth question, Judge Rakoff asked "[h]ow was the amount of the proposed judgment determined? [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 9:56 am
The need to accept such upsets rather than seek redress in tort is what I take the Court of Appeal to be expressing in its quote from Vanek v. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 9:39 am by Laura Sandwell, Matrix
On Thursday 10 November Lady Hale and Lords Hope, Mance, Kerr and Clarke will hear Aberdeen City Council v Stewart Milne Group Ltd, an appeal from the Court of Session (Scotland) disputing the amount payable by the appellant to the respondent in regards to an “uplift” payment owed upon resale of land sold by the respondent. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 12:40 pm
Sections 35 and 35A have been considered recently by this Court in Salem Advocates Bar Association v. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 8:39 am by WSLL
CiteID=464698ORDER OF PUBLIC CENSUREThe Court, after a careful review of the Board of Professional Responsibility’s Report and Recommendation, the “Stipulated Motion for Public Censure and to File a Report and Recommendation,” Respondent’s Affidavit, and the file, finds that the Report and Recommendation should be approved, confirmed and adopted by the Court, and that Respondent should be publicly censured for her violation of a duty owed to a… [read post]
15 Oct 2011, 8:02 am by Eric
It was hit with another $225M in damages, bringing the amount it owes MGA to $310M. [read post]
15 Oct 2011, 4:43 am by Mandelman
  So, plotting data on a ‘V” shaped model but having it turn out to be a different letter of  the alphabet, is a like drawing the route New Jersey on a map of Australia. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 10:21 am
It is not often that the United States Supreme Court hears a family law case, so the Court's June, 2011, ruling in Turner v. [read post]
8 Oct 2011, 4:36 am by rnahoum
Definitions [15 USC 1692a] As used in this title – (1) The term “Commission” means the Federal Trade Commission. (2) The term “communication” means the conveying of information regarding a debt directly or indirectly to any person through any medium. (3) The term “consumer” means any natural person obligated or allegedly obligated to pay any debt. (4) The term “creditor” means any person who offers or extends credit creating a debt or to whom a… [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 10:47 am by J
So, without further ado, we come first to Church Commissioners v Derdabi [2011] UKUT 380 (LC).The appellants were the freeholders of a property in London and the respondent was their long leaseholder. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 10:47 am by J
So, without further ado, we come first to Church Commissioners v Derdabi [2011] UKUT 380 (LC).The appellants were the freeholders of a property in London and the respondent was their long leaseholder. [read post]