Search for: "People v Lord"
Results 1721 - 1740
of 1,806
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jul 2008, 1:31 pm
Are people frightened of me? [read post]
23 Jul 2008, 4:01 am
The number one term that people have searched Lord Google to find this blog, drumroll please……. [read post]
18 Jul 2008, 8:34 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: EU Commission adopts proposal to extend copyright protection to performing artists from 50 to 95 years: (IPKat), (Out-Law), (IP Law360), (Patry Copyright Blog), (IPEG), (Techdirt), (Techdirt), ‘Triway’ USPTO, EPO, JPO patent work-sharing pilot starts 28 July: (IP Updates), (Patent Docs), (Patent Prospector), (EPO),… [read post]
13 Jul 2008, 4:50 am
Finding people in this case to be "articles of commerce," the majority found the statute to be a form of unconstitutional discrimination against out-of-state commerce. [read post]
12 Jul 2008, 10:48 pm
On applications for permission to appeal to the House of Lords: Omar v Birmingham City Council - Omar refused permission to appeal from this Court of Appeal judgment. [read post]
12 Jul 2008, 11:01 am
Faarah, R (on the application of) v London Borough of Southwark [2008] EWCA Civ 807 was the result. [read post]
11 Jul 2008, 4:30 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: ACTA continues to be discussed and debated: (Michael Geist), (Intellectual Property Watch), (Public Knowledge), (Techdirt), (Managing Intellectual Property), (Public Knowledge), (Public Knowledge), (Public Knowledge), Apotex challenge to Acular LS patent barred by res judicata: Roche Palo Alto & Allergan v Apotex:… [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 1:08 pm
It does not, in our view, affect the substance of Article 25, which is concerned with universal franchise and the free expression of the people in the choice of legislature. [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 1:20 pm
Today the Supremes handed down their ruling in District of Columbia v. [read post]
12 Jun 2008, 11:52 am
Some people have suggested that when the House of Lords becomes our Supreme Court in just over a year, it should abandon the practice of judges giving individual judgments, sometimes disagreeing with each other, which means lawyers have to work out exactly who's won, and on what points. [read post]
9 Jun 2008, 10:50 pm
Hounslow argued that decisions on provision of social housing can only be challenged by way of judicial review, citing O’Rourke v Camden LBC [1998] A.C. 188, in which the House of Lords struck out a claim for damages for a failure to accommodate as homeless pursuant to s.63(1) Housing Act 1985. [read post]
15 May 2008, 8:37 am
The Evening Standard expresses the view that judges can be removed by The Lord Chief Justice “if their conduct is seen to be putting the reputation of the judiciary at risk. [read post]
14 May 2008, 9:25 pm
What's he going to tell these evangelicals if he is elected and appoints a Supreme Court Justice likely to uphold Roe v. [read post]
13 May 2008, 1:19 pm
As many people have already emailed me to tell me (alright, four people, all of them lovely), McCann v United Kingdom 19009/04 was handed down today. [read post]
7 May 2008, 12:30 am
This may confuse people in and outside of the UK. [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 5:12 am
Good Lord, I miss seeing my family. [read post]
24 Apr 2008, 4:02 pm
Apparently Wandsworth are very very unhappy with the Court of Appeal judgment in Wandsworth v Randall on underoccupation possessions via ground 16 HA 1985. [read post]
23 Apr 2008, 1:22 pm
They also lead people to spend far more on the legal battle and is warranted by the sums actually at stake. [read post]
21 Apr 2008, 10:25 am
"Since September, when the Supreme Court agreed to take up Baze v. [read post]
6 Apr 2008, 7:01 am
The 1995 Act was enacted to provide remedies for disabled people at the receiving end of unlawful discrimination. [read post]
