Search for: "People v. London" Results 1721 - 1740 of 1,929
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Dec 2017, 7:34 am by Ben
  One of the more incredible allegations about Prenda Law, the copyright-trolling operation that sued people for downloading movies online, was that the lawyers behind Prenda and its associated companies might have created and uploaded some of the porn, simply as a way of catching more offenders. [read post]
2 May 2012, 5:52 am by Rob Robinson
Georgetown Law Rolls Out the ‘Law Firm Pronunciation Guide - bit.ly/KoaqON (Bruce Carton) Global Aerospace Inc. v. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 1:05 am
People transferred gold and silver to each other in order to satisfy important obligations as well as to obtain items of more direct and obvious use. [read post]
16 Dec 2014, 4:00 am by Ken Chasse
For example the Federation of Law Societies’ (FLSC’s) text, Inventory of Access to Legal Services Initiatives of the Law Societies of Canada of 2012,[v] defines the problem in its opening paragraph as being merely, “gaps in access to legal services. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 11:13 am by Roshonda Scipio
March 2011 Law Library Acquisitions ListAfricaKQC772 .K5 2010Statutory recognition of customary land rights in Africa : an investigation into best practices for lawmaking and implementation / by Rachael S. [read post]
23 Dec 2013, 2:26 am by Tessa Shepperson
  However he has the London Assembly report to cheer him up. [read post]
23 Dec 2014, 12:48 pm by Giles Peaker
The mother was living in temporary accommodation at the time in London Borough of Redbridge (LBR). [read post]
15 Feb 2014, 4:13 pm by INFORRM
The interim order was unsuccessfully challenged and Carr was granted an injunction against the press until further notice (Carr v News  Group Newspapers [2005] EWHC 971 (QB)). [read post]
8 Dec 2015, 1:58 pm by Elina Saxena
They add that "a search for belonging, purpose, adventure, and friendship, appear to remain the main reasons for people to join the Islamic State. [read post]
30 Mar 2016, 4:30 am
  Is there something about March 30 that breeds people who turn their blues into art?) [read post]
5 Nov 2015, 12:15 pm by Elina Saxena, Cody M. Poplin
As investigations into the incident continue, Egyptian President Abdel Fattah el-Sisi is in London to meet British Prime Minister David Cameron. [read post]
19 May 2022, 4:45 am by Miquel Montañá (Clifford Chance)
Our last blog entry, UPC: four reasons on why the PPA is not legally in force, published on 21 April 2022, seems to have touched a nerve, as attested by the unprecedented number of comments received, for which this author is very grateful. [read post]
17 Feb 2015, 9:17 am by Steven M. Taber
  However, the legal landscape with respect to this aspect may have changed a bit with the decision in Helicopter Association International v. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 8:09 am
The new reality might not be Cardinal Mindszenty but Julian Assage, ironically a guest of the Ecuadorian Embassy in London for 5 years ending in 2019 when he was asked to leave (here). [read post]
8 Jan 2023, 7:35 am
This is elaborated a little more in the abstract: Pix credit hereABSTRACT: When the leaders of the United States and of the Peoples Republic of China refer to human rights, they invoke entirely different conceptions. [read post]
28 Apr 2019, 12:48 pm
v=kcCObU0pIp8.This week, China's future global dominance was on full display as foreign leaders headed to Beijing in the hope of securing lucrative projects as part of China's Belt and Road Initiative. [read post]
24 Aug 2014, 5:44 am by Giles Peaker
While the statement of reasons in this case gives a clear basis for the decision, there is no address to the Upper Tribunal case of TD v SSWP and London Borough of Richmond-Upon-Thames (HB) 2013 UKUT 642 AAC or the finding on the meaning of ‘occupy’ in the regulations in R (Marchant) v Swale Borough Council HBRB [2000] 1 FLR 246. [read post]
6 Sep 2007, 5:08 am
  NASA couldn't build a Saturn V today. [read post]
20 Dec 2020, 8:15 pm by Ilya Somin
City of New London was rightly decided, and that the Constitution allows the government to condemn property for almost any reason it wants. [read post]