Search for: "People v. Long"
Results 1721 - 1740
of 19,103
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 May 2022, 11:29 am
And we’ve already seen legislators talking about how Griswold v. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 6:08 pm
In Balderas v. [read post]
14 Jul 2020, 9:01 pm
In Kahler v. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 3:19 pm
Sterling access to the evidence which, when eventually obtained, helped prove his innocence.So it was kind of shocking to see that in People v Woodrich (4th dept 9/30/11) the Appellate Division, Fourth Department, cited its decision in Sterling as the authority for rejection another inmates' motion for DNA testing:County Court properly denied the motion “because defendant failed to establish that there was a reasonable probability that, had those items been tested [further] and… [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 3:19 pm
Sterling access to the evidence which, when eventually obtained, helped prove his innocence.So it was kind of shocking to see that in People v Woodrich (4th dept 9/30/11) the Appellate Division, Fourth Department, cited its decision in Sterling as the authority for rejection another inmates' motion for DNA testing:County Court properly denied the motion “because defendant failed to establish that there was a reasonable probability that, had those items been tested… [read post]
5 Jul 2016, 9:01 pm
In Birchfield v. [read post]
1 Feb 2022, 4:44 am
In Grutter v. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 3:00 am
Fujian Mawei Shipbuilding, Ltd. of the People’s Republic of China (E.D. [read post]
3 May 2022, 11:40 am
ACS believes that the Constitution is “of the people, by the people, and for the people. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 2:13 pm
The thing is, this won't take long. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 2:13 pm
The thing is, this won't take long. [read post]
17 Dec 2009, 9:09 pm
[Post by Venkat] Abbas v. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 4:23 am
Texas already releases 72,000 people per year, so most folks in TDCJ are going to get out. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 7:48 pm
Bennett and McComish v. [read post]
19 Jan 2009, 2:59 pm
It seems everyone has put forth their opinion on the impact of Herring v. [read post]
20 Jan 2020, 6:36 am
Norris v. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 11:35 pm
Or maybe just people who believe in our legal system. [read post]
20 Apr 2022, 8:04 am
So long as a law leaves people free to say what they want, it may generally restrict people's decisions about whom to do business with—which are generally regulable conduct, not constitutionally protected speech. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 12:51 am
The frequency and long duration of the unhindered flagrant infringement by MNL also weighed heavily on the FHC’s mind. [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 4:57 pm
It is one, of course, that long time readers know I've touched on often. [read post]
