Search for: "People v. Modell" Results 1721 - 1740 of 4,409
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Sep 2017, 5:17 pm by Larry
Take, for example, Roe v. [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 2:13 pm
Thus, in the case of the transposition of federal whistle blower models to universities, the scope of such protection is deceptive for employees of universities who work on a federal grant, subgrant or subcontract, building traps for people who mistakenly believe they "whistleblow" under its protection. [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 8:44 am by Florian Mueller
That case involves a standard-essential utility model, which is why I got interested in it. [read post]
15 Mar 2015, 9:27 am by Omar Ha-Redeye
As a Legal Post article discussing Tossonian v. [read post]
11 Feb 2019, 2:02 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
The social science literature suggests that jury instructions do matter.Ramsey: use AIPLA or INTA—more likely to be adopted by judges if institutions are involved.Lunney: fighting against jury’s moral intuitions is an uphill battle, and the parties have no interest in model instructions in their own case—so can you get a model that the judge will follow even in the face of pressure from the parties? [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 10:12 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Maybe we need to balance incentives for marginal artists v. incentives for most popular, instead of incentives v. access. [read post]
5 Aug 2023, 3:00 am by Chip Merlin
His public comment to The History of Public Adjusting—Samuel Milch v. [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 7:13 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Rigidity v. flexibility: advocates for more specific defenses. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 7:53 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  The ads have 20-something models doing things that 15 year olds could do. [read post]
15 Oct 2018, 8:00 am by JB
  Gienapp uses the example of the Virgina 1782 Case of the Prisoners (Commonwealth v. [read post]
24 Dec 2020, 1:32 am by CMS
  Unlike the primary focus of this Blog, it deals not with the appeals the court hears, but with the behaviour of the people at the heart of decision-making in the Court: the UKSC Justices. [read post]
17 Jan 2023, 10:20 am by Holly
[iv] In other words, ChatGPT is simply a language prediction model. [read post]
2 May 2016, 2:50 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
People assume 512 notice and takedown model for complaints unrelated to ©. [read post]
10 Aug 2013, 2:37 pm by Stephen Bilkis
The notion that joint or common owners of property cannot be charged with larceny is firmly rooted in common law as held in People v Zinke. [read post]