Search for: "People v. Roberts" Results 1721 - 1740 of 6,789
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jan 2012, 2:41 pm by Jeff Neuburger
Justice Scalia’s majority opinion, joined by Justices Roberts, Kennedy and Thomas, focused on the language of the Fourth Amendment, that expresses the “right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, paper, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures…. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 5:41 pm by Jeff Neuburger
Justice Scalia’s majority opinion, joined by Justices Roberts, Kennedy and Thomas, focused on the language of the Fourth Amendment, that expresses the “right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, paper, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures…. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 5:42 pm by David
David Cassuto From the email: The DePaul Center for Animal Law cordially invites you and your colleagues to join us for this year’s symposium, “Revisiting the Line between Free Speech and Obscenity: U.S. v. [read post]
3 Nov 2008, 2:27 pm
Supreme Court will hear argument in Federal Communications Commission v. [read post]
13 May 2007, 11:18 pm
Yesterday, on "Fox News Sunday," Chris Wallace invited Rudy Giuliani to clarify what he'd said at the Republican debate on the subject of abortion, that it would be "okay" if Roe v. [read post]
29 Nov 2007, 12:27 pm
Justice Robert Rucker, who wrote the opinion issued Tuesday, agreed. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 4:44 am by Susan Brenner
At the second evidentiary hearing, defense expert Robert Young testified that JH's laptop would not have automatically connected to Belkin54G the first time she lost her signal. [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 2:05 pm by David Lat
* A nice round-up of reactions to Snyder v. [read post]
23 Aug 2019, 3:36 am by SHG
At least Robert Smith’s motivation was to relieve his patients’ suffering. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 2:49 pm by Amy Howe
” Much of Monday’s argument focused on the Supreme Court’s 1962 ruling in Robinson v. [read post]
19 Mar 2007, 3:47 pm
During the argument in Morse v. [read post]