Search for: "Powers v. Ohio" Results 1721 - 1740 of 2,094
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Nov 2019, 9:05 pm by Milad Emamian
” In its 2018 decision in Ohio v. [read post]
14 Sep 2021, 7:37 am by Steve Lubet
As Justice Kavanaugh explained in his powerful concurring opinion in NCAA v. [read post]
10 May 2012, 7:58 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
They also introduced a mail-order box for a 37mm grenade launcher from a company called American Ammo from Ohio, and the stern instructions that came with it, warning that using the product for anything other than as a low-powered "wildlife control banger" could get the user in serious trouble with the federal government. [read post]
31 Oct 2009, 4:06 pm by admin
(R&M) on alleged clean-air violations at the company’s chemical plant at 1019 Haverhill-Ohio Furnace Road, Haverhill, Ohio. [read post]
17 Dec 2008, 7:16 pm
Washington, No. 07-1523, 07-1884, 07-2541 Federal district courts lack the inherent power to vacate a sentence procured by fraud, any such power having been abrogated by the enactment of 18 U.S.C. section 3582(c) and the amendments to FRCP 35. [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
With free legal aid from National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation, Geary filed a federal complaint arguing the union infringed on her constitutionally protected rights under the foundation-won CWA v. [read post]
31 Mar 2025, 7:15 am by Evan Bernick
" In fact, several Ohio papers printed Lawrence's remarks. [read post]
19 Feb 2017, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
London Internet Exchange (LINX) faces a growing backlash over changes to its rules that would gag its directors applying secret government orders to monitor networks, under Britain’s Investigatory Powers Act. [read post]
3 Apr 2009, 7:23 pm
Gore & Assoc (Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) District Court N D Ohio: False patent marking may not be false advertising: Rainworks Ltd v Mill-Rose Co (Rebecca Tushnet's 43(B)log) District Court S D New York: infringement of ‘essential’ patent in patent pool: Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. v. [read post]
13 Oct 2008, 12:12 pm
ECJ clarifies rules relating to notice: K-Swiss Inc v OHIM (Class 46) EU Competitiveness Council resolution against counterfeiting and piracy (Class 46) EU states back three-point anti-piracy plan (Managing Intellectual Property) Fuel cells and wind power lead European patent filings for clean energy technology (Green Patent Blog) More non-minor geographical indicator (GI) amendments published (Class 46) No sign of any Community patent progress, despite Verheugen's optimism… [read post]
30 Jun 2019, 6:30 am by Sandy Levinson
  He agrees with what is near conventional wisdom, for example, that Marbury represents far more of a prudential decision about the Court’s actual capacity to work its will against an oppositional Jeffersonian Administration than a truly convincing interpretation of Section 13 of the Judiciary Act of 1789 and/or Article III with regard to Congress’s power to add to the stipulated original jurisdiction of the Supreme Court. [read post]
12 Nov 2011, 12:56 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
These types of profiles are very commercially powerful. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 7:24 am by Sasha Volokh
Where providers effectively compete with one another, market accountability can also be a powerful tool that cuts in favor of private provision, and the same could be said of legal accountability, if private providers are more amenable to lawsuits. [read post]