Search for: "Public Service Co. v. State"
Results 1721 - 1740
of 5,844
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jun 2019, 5:43 am
In Patouhas v Patouhas, 2019 WL 2202430 (2d Dept.,2019) plaintiff commenced an action for a divorce on March 1, 2016, by service of a summons with notice upon the defendant. [read post]
6 Jun 2019, 1:44 pm
The questioning at oral argument was dominated by Chief Justice Tani Cantil-Sakauye, who observed early on that the binding precedent of Muzzy Ranch Co. v. [read post]
6 Jun 2019, 9:02 am
Hutton, 355 F.3d 206, 210 (2d Cir. 2004); also citing Croton Watch Co. v. [read post]
6 Jun 2019, 5:01 am
That is the necessary implication of Rumsfeld v. [read post]
6 Jun 2019, 4:01 am
”[10] The issue of “healing” is effectively discarded in R. v. [read post]
5 Jun 2019, 1:38 pm
Federal Courts Mozilla Corporation, et al. v. [read post]
5 Jun 2019, 9:58 am
” The solicitor general also recommended that review be denied in several more cases: In Airline Service Providers Associations v. [read post]
4 Jun 2019, 9:42 am
These decisions and orders largely flew under the radar until Jeff Ehrlich, CFPB Deputy Enforcement Director, mentioned them on May 20 in Chicago when he spoke at the PLI 24th Annual Consumer Financial Services Institute, which I co-chaired. [read post]
2 Jun 2019, 4:31 pm
Despite the controversy around these practices, it has never been discussed at the Supreme Court of Canada, until their recent decision in R. v. [read post]
31 May 2019, 6:00 am
Apart from his ACA decisions, in his dissent in Obergefell v. [read post]
29 May 2019, 9:01 pm
District Court in Texas v. [read post]
27 May 2019, 6:17 am
Kapalua Land Co. [read post]
23 May 2019, 9:30 pm
” HUD Secretary Ben Carson appeared before the House Financial Services Committee to answer questions about three new public housing bills, including H.R. 2763. [read post]
21 May 2019, 8:27 am
These developments impact many SaaS providers, especially due to the expanded nexus provisions that many states are enacting after the United States Supreme Court’s South Dakota v. [read post]
20 May 2019, 9:11 am
In Vine v. [read post]
18 May 2019, 9:27 am
Rather, he stated that the factors relevant to his attorney's fees were (1) the amount in controversy, (2) the complexity of the case, and (3) his knowledge and experience—three of the eight factors set out in Arthur Andersen & Co. v. [read post]
14 May 2019, 4:00 am
"Noting that the Court of Appeals in Matter of Prisoners' Legal Services, 73 NY2d at 32 indicated that whether a document "containing personal, employment-related information about a public employee," that is under the control of the agency, and "relied upon in evaluating the employee's performance" is covered by Civil Rights Law §50-a "depends upon its nature and use in evaluating an officer's performance. [read post]
14 May 2019, 4:00 am
"Noting that the Court of Appeals in Matter of Prisoners' Legal Services, 73 NY2d at 32 indicated that whether a document "containing personal, employment-related information about a public employee," that is under the control of the agency, and "relied upon in evaluating the employee's performance" is covered by Civil Rights Law §50-a "depends upon its nature and use in evaluating an officer's performance. [read post]
14 May 2019, 2:55 am
In other words, the bill would shift onto the State’s private sector employers the obligation to subsidize the State’s pension funds without actually increasing the compensation of disabled public safety workers. [read post]
