Search for: "SMITH v. STATE"
Results 1721 - 1740
of 9,948
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Nov 2020, 2:31 am
The last phrase of this rule was the part that gave Justice Sam Alito pause in his concurring opinion in Taylor v. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 9:20 am
The Fort Worth Star-Telegram reports, "State Bar of Texas to honor UT Arlington official," by Diane Smith. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 12:44 pm
The Opinion of Advocate General Wahl was published today in Case C‑125/14 Iron & Smith Kft v Unilever NV, a request for a preliminary ruling by the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) from the Hungarian Fővárosi Törvényszék -- that's the Budapest Municipal Court, if you didn't know ["I knew that", said Merpel ...]. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 6:10 am
Ltd. v. [read post]
8 Sep 2020, 9:10 pm
Tomkins, Smith & Tomkins, One Lakeview Place, Nashville, TN. [read post]
24 Dec 2020, 4:15 am
In C.F. v. [read post]
14 May 2012, 8:13 am
Press v. [read post]
14 May 2012, 8:13 am
Press v. [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 1:57 pm
Smith (Disenrollment)* State Courts Bulletinhttp://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2015state.htmlEstate of Ducheneaux v. [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 5:30 am
Smith, No. 09-2324 (6th Cir. [read post]
19 Jul 2024, 5:46 pm
After an incredibly busy week, I finally had time today to read carefully Judge Aileen Cannon's opinion in United States v. [read post]
24 Feb 2015, 7:14 am
It is said that the law cannot keep pace with society, evolving about twenty years slower than the culture, but even the United States Supreme Court has caught on to the uniqueness of the modern “cell phone,” calling the devices “minicomputers that also happen to have the capacity to be used as a telephone” in a landmark case last year called Riley v. [read post]
15 Aug 2008, 11:45 am
U.S. v. [read post]
3 Mar 2017, 7:14 am
New York also cited concerns voiced by several federalism scholars who argued that this type of subpoena can put state sovereignty at risk, and it may disrupt an ongoing enforcement matter.Separately, Maryland Attorney General Brian Frosh announced that 15 state attorneys general sent a letter to Chairman Smith urging him to withdraw subpoena requests made to New York and Massachusetts. [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 9:26 am
In Dunn v. [read post]
22 May 2017, 4:09 pm
The effect of Article 15 can be seen in the ECJ decisions of SABAM v Scarlet and SABAM v Netlog prohibiting content filtering injunctions, and in Arnold J’s Cartier judgment itself: “If ISPs could be required to block websites without having actual knowledge of infringing activity, that would be tantamount to a general obligation to monitor. [read post]
1 Oct 2020, 7:11 am
Smith should be revisited? [read post]
17 Sep 2013, 8:10 am
Carhart, and its decision earlier this summer in United States v. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 12:18 pm
The panel consists of Judges Kozinski, Fernandez and Randy Smith. [read post]
23 Jan 2011, 8:20 am
United States v. [read post]
