Search for: "STATE v. DEAN" Results 1721 - 1740 of 2,638
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Dec 2011, 3:48 pm by NL
The District Judge’s order stated that the court found that Ms Boyle was and had been a secure tenant of the Highbury flat within the meaning of section 79 of the 1985 Act. [read post]
18 Dec 2011, 3:48 pm by NL
The District Judge’s order stated that the court found that Ms Boyle was and had been a secure tenant of the Highbury flat within the meaning of section 79 of the 1985 Act. [read post]
2 Jan 2014, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
The proposed lines dividing each of the six new states are provisional; under Draper’s proposal, over the next few years, any county that adjoins any of the proposed states can choose to become part of that contiguous state, provided that the counties that are provisionally in that neighboring state also agree to add such a county. [read post]
10 Mar 2017, 3:22 pm by Abbe Gluck
  For a bill of this magnitude, not getting the score before the vote was highly unorthodox .In King v. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 9:30 pm by ernst
  Much of the research he presents "has been ignored or overlooked in the existing scholarship on Section Three, and most of it does not appear in any of the briefs in Trump v. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 6:24 am by David Markus
Supreme Court case in 2009, Flores-Figueroa v. [read post]
20 May 2024, 11:41 am by Daniel M. Kowalski
Judge Wright puts it plainly stating that ICE's practice can be more accurately termed "knock and arrests" and "violate[s] the Fourth Amendment. [read post]
4 Nov 2024, 8:02 pm
Martin Belov, Organizer of the conference, editor of the conference volume and Vice Dean of the Faculty of Law of the University of Sofia ‘St. [read post]
3 May 2013, 6:11 am by Rachel Sachs
Perry (the challenge to Proposition 8) and United States v. [read post]
10 Nov 2019, 4:00 am by INFORRM
While Justice Thomas has cast some doubt on this form of analysis in his opinion in Reed v. [read post]
8 Apr 2020, 6:50 am by Andrew Hamm
Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit contravened the Supreme Court’s repeated admonition that “state-court decisions be given the benefit of the doubt,” as in Cullen v. [read post]