Search for: "Scales v. State"
Results 1721 - 1740
of 4,894
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Apr 2007, 3:44 pm
The following Mass v. [read post]
19 Jan 2018, 11:38 am
The list largely mirrors the countries referenced in President Obama’s last WPR letter, but in most of these countries U.S. military operations scaled up in President Trump’s first year. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 4:49 pm
A personal status did not need to be immutable or innate (Clift v the United Kingdom no 7205/07 July 2010 and A, and Others v the United Kingdom [GC] no 3455/05 ECHR 2009). 5. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 4:49 pm
A personal status did not need to be immutable or innate (Clift v the United Kingdom no 7205/07 July 2010 and A, and Others v the United Kingdom [GC] no 3455/05 ECHR 2009). 5. [read post]
6 May 2024, 9:00 pm
This is particularly true in high-stakes, large-scale tort litigation in which multiple plaintiffs sue a common defendant. [read post]
31 Dec 2018, 8:03 am
The Supreme Court reiterated this concern in its 1960 decision in United States v. [read post]
19 Mar 2014, 9:01 pm
Co. v. [read post]
19 Aug 2013, 9:45 am
Am., Inc. v. [read post]
21 Nov 2014, 2:36 pm
Three academic publishers filed suit against Georgia State University claiming that the University infringed their copyrights by maintaining a policy which allows GSU professors to make digital copies of excerpts of their books available to students without paying them a royalty. [read post]
11 Jul 2016, 7:15 am
Like the UMG v. [read post]
21 Sep 2010, 10:38 am
I've now had a chance to read the Fifth Circuit's opinion in SEC v. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 1:05 pm
One v. [read post]
30 Nov 2021, 2:24 pm
Wade and Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
10 Sep 2018, 6:30 am
In Hebbronville Lone Star Rentals, LLC v. [read post]
15 May 2010, 5:21 pm
Fair Isaac Corp. v. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 4:20 am
The case The applicant company – no saint, even in the unsaintly tradition of Strasbourg “victims” – had engineered large-scale tax evasion schemes causing unprecedented damage to the State’s fiscal affairs whilst creating substantial riches for the company’s shareholders. [read post]
31 Jul 2011, 7:32 pm
Karuk Tribe of California v. [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 11:21 am
It could also lead to large-scale legal action against employers in the state. [read post]
3 Jul 2015, 8:24 am
This being so, there was insufficient evidence to establish validity of the two Community trade marks through the acquisition of distinctive character.Revocation of the CTMs for non-use From a review of the case law of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) and especially the ONEL/OMEL case [Case C-149/11 Leno Merken, noted by the IPKat here], it appeared that the law was as follows: (i) the question of whether there has been ‘genuine use in the Community’ is not to be… [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 9:44 am
Judge Posner held in Apple v. [read post]
