Search for: "Shields v. United States" Results 1721 - 1740 of 2,124
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Apr 2021, 4:03 am by Peter Mahler
Simon v Moskowitz In Simon v Moskowitz, the Appellate Division affirmed in part and reversed in part a lower court’s order dismissing claims by a minority member against the majority member of a profitable, two-member LLC that owns a 60-unit, rental apartment building in the Bronx. [read post]
29 Dec 2010, 12:54 pm by Bexis
  There've been a raft of good decisions, although none from the United States Supreme Court, for all us practitioners on the right (in more ways than one) side of the “v. [read post]
10 Apr 2016, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
United States In the Hulk Hogan case Gawker has filed motions seeking a new trial. [read post]
13 Dec 2021, 5:32 am by INFORRM
Secretary of State for Digital, Culture, Media & Sport Nadine Dorries announced a new pact on the use and exchange of data between the two nations. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 2:00 am by INFORRM
  On the same date HHJ Parkes QC heard a “Norwich Pharmacal” application in the case of Patel v Unite. [read post]
16 Jul 2024, 6:05 am by Kathleen Claussen
  Second, Congress should prohibit the executive branch from relying on an international agreement it has negotiated as the legal basis under which any good or service is imported into the United States, exported from the United States, or regulated while in the United States, unless Congress has either explicitly authorized the agreement in advance or approved it after its conclusion. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 3:00 am by Peter A. Mahler
The court also cited Paul's "admission" that his desire to shield assets from his wife because of marital difficulties motivated his granting shares to his son. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 7:45 pm by David Kravets
Pregerson appeared via a live video feed from Los Angeles and was not present here at the William Kenzo Nakamura United States Courthouse. [read post]
13 Jan 2015, 12:03 pm by Amy Howe
United States, in which the Justices have expressed similar unease with the potential scope of prosecutorial discretion, is not clear. [read post]
4 May 2016, 6:58 am by David Posner
On the one hand, before he approves the proposed class action settlement, the United States District Court Judge in the O’Connor case is required by Rule 23(e) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure to determine whether the settlement is fair and adequate; information that appears to be relevant to this determination in the O’Connor case are such things as the most recent valuation of Uber as a company, as well as data on the number of miles logged by drivers, gross… [read post]
21 Jul 2010, 8:32 pm by Dwight Sullivan
NMCCA analyzed CAAF’s decision in United States v. [read post]