Search for: "State v Sullivan"
Results 1721 - 1740
of 2,736
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Dec 2009, 11:06 am
The judge concludes with quotes from Berger v. [read post]
24 Oct 2019, 4:00 am
He then builds on the work of Driedger and Ruth Sullivan[2] by delving into the different aspects of the modern principle, first by breaking it down and examining it. [read post]
8 Dec 2021, 1:53 pm
Analogous to the case of Leventhal v. [read post]
11 Sep 2009, 2:47 am
Sullivan, 978 F.2d 560, 562-63 (9th Cir. 1992); Biotics Research Corp. v. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 12:57 pm
E.D., October 25, 2011), Sullivan, J. [read post]
18 Sep 2014, 11:17 am
Ever since the FDA decided that discretion was the better part of valor – or read the handwriting on the wall – and decided not to appeal United States v. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 2:21 am
Scobie stated that he had not included the names to comply with libel laws and asserted that the allegations had been printed in error. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 2:14 pm
V. [read post]
30 Aug 2024, 5:23 pm
Tex.) in X Corp. v. [read post]
26 Feb 2023, 4:00 am
Sullivan. [read post]
8 May 2020, 3:43 am
” United States v. [read post]
2 Mar 2023, 11:50 am
R. 501.5 See United States v. [read post]
2 Mar 2023, 11:50 am
R. 501.5 See United States v. [read post]
24 May 2011, 7:16 am
Sullivan. [read post]
18 Jul 2022, 5:55 am
And in United States v. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 9:40 am
Sullivan, 12 So.3d 771 (Fla. [read post]
29 Nov 2016, 6:09 am
In Matter of Sullivan v. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 1:12 pm
Coffee said we should all keep our eyes out for the Third Circuit’s forthcoming en banc opinion in Sullivan v. [read post]
18 Apr 2023, 4:00 am
The district court dismissed the case under Rule 12 for failure to state a claim, but the Court of Appeals (Sullivan, Chin and Bianco) reinstates the claim.How does this case fare under Littlejohn and Vega? [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 12:00 am
At the same time, courts recognize that every disciplinary situation is different and are pre-disposed to accord “much deference” to the employer’s determination regarding the penalty to be imposed [Ahsaf v Nyquist, 37 NY2d 182], especially with respect to quasi-military organizations such as a police department or a similar law enforcement agency [Kelly v Safir, 96 NY2d 32].In Gradel v Sullivan Co. [read post]