Search for: "State v. Barrett" Results 1721 - 1740 of 1,969
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Apr 2024, 5:31 pm by Josh Blackman
I am very familiar with this limbo, as the Defense Distributed case is stuck somewhere between the Garden State and the Lone Star State. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 6:53 pm by Mark Walsh
” Justice Amy Coney Barrett notes that she grew up in New Orleans. [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
The Affordable Care Act (ACA) makes its third trip to the Supreme Court today under the caption California v. [read post]
11 Feb 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
Case Background The Supreme Court is poised to resolve this circuit split in Macquarie Infrastructure Corporation v. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Yahoo News – Michael Bender and Anjali Huynh (New York Times) | Published: 11/29/2023 Since the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. [read post]
5 Aug 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Political Influence Operation MSN – Devlin Barrett (Washington Post) | Published: 7/29/2022 Federal authorities charged a Russian man with a years-long malign influence campaign targeting American politics – alleging he used American groups in Florida, Georgia, and California to sow discord and push pro-Russia propaganda. [read post]
28 Nov 2018, 11:11 am by Adam Feldman
Potential Supreme Court nominee Judge Amy Coney Barrett described aspects of horizontal stare decisis in a 2003 article for Notre Dame Law Review. [read post]
30 Aug 2024, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
In a few of the biggest Supreme Court decisions of the last few years – including Dobbs v. [read post]
22 Feb 2022, 7:18 pm by Mark Walsh
The first case, Ysleta del Sur Pueblo v. [read post]
10 Jan 2025, 11:31 am by Josh Blackman
As I recall, Seth Barrett Tillman was the first person to raise the Scalia opinion in late December 2016. [read post]
8 Aug 2024, 11:11 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Prince rejects fair use when his stated intent was to have fun. [read post]
24 May 2023, 7:55 am by Dan Farber
Barrett, the fifth vote to uphold the California law, wrote that she was joining this part of the opinion but not the substantial burden part. [read post]