Search for: "State v. Dakota"
Results 1721 - 1740
of 2,221
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 May 2019, 6:34 am
However, in South Dakota v. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 12:33 pm
§ 841(a)(l) as defined in United States v. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 3:24 pm
South Dakota (D.S.D. 2011) ("subsequent decisions by the United States Supreme Court expressly cast doubt on the [ ] validity of the special public-interest doctrine" (internal quotation marks and citation omitted)); Fujii v. [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 7:50 pm
#13: Pennzoil-Quaker State Co. v. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 9:47 am
Tellingly, all three came from red states. [read post]
28 Aug 2017, 6:42 am
North Dakota, where the events of this case unfolded, is one such state. [read post]
27 Jan 2025, 10:42 pm
Say you’re in a Criminal Law class and getting cold called on People v. [read post]
21 Jan 2018, 7:40 am
Additional Resources: Schaefer v. [read post]
19 Apr 2009, 1:44 pm
The Supreme Court has said as much repeatedly, most notably in South Dakota v. [read post]
6 Jul 2013, 10:38 am
San Diego County Bar Tackles Lawyer Friend Requests and the Ex Parte RuleSouth Dakota S.Ct Recognizes the Obvious: a Happy Birthday Message on Facebook Doesn't Mean Much -- Onnen v. [read post]
11 Apr 2018, 6:26 am
If the federal government gives the go-ahead for collecting sales tax on remote sales (a Supreme Court case, Wayfair v. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 4:32 pm
[v] Iowa law also prohibits local governments, such as cities and counties, from setting minimum wages higher than the state rate. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 12:00 pm
United States 14-1145Issue: Whether, under Holland v. [read post]
4 May 2016, 9:01 pm
North Dakota. [read post]
12 Jan 2021, 3:59 am
Wirecard AG v. [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 3:05 pm
The case, Consumer Financial Protection Bureau v. [read post]
19 Jul 2008, 9:07 pm
In its opinion in United States v. [read post]
30 Nov 2020, 8:23 am
Reply briefs in the FCC v. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 6:42 am
North Dakota, limiting state power to tax sales to in-state customers, allowing such levies only when the company involved had an actual presence in the state — such as an office, sales force, or property. [read post]
24 May 2024, 9:35 am
In the case of Birchfield v. [read post]
