Search for: "State v. Davis " Results 1721 - 1740 of 6,078
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Feb 2018, 9:16 am by Alfred Brophy
  Maybe I’d put Angela Davis, If They Come in the Morning (1971) into this category. [read post]
29 Jan 2018, 2:57 am
The French court of appeal cancelled the French marks and assigned the name domain « France.com » to the State of France. [read post]
25 Jan 2018, 5:00 am by Anonymous
Overall, this is a harmful trend characterized by excessive State responses. [read post]
25 Jan 2018, 2:59 am by Danielle DerOhannesian
In the case Karen Atala and Daughters v Chile, Professor Davis co-authored the amicus curiae brief arguing that sexual orientation and gender identity are protected classes under international law. [read post]
23 Jan 2018, 4:34 am
Multilateralism v Bilateralism: What’s in it for international IP regulation? [read post]
9 Jan 2018, 12:43 pm by Liskow & Lewis
Prior to Doiron, the test for maritime contracts in the Fifth Circuit was a complex fact-intensive six-factor inquiry, established in Davis & Sons, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Jan 2018, 12:43 pm by Don K. Haycraft and Patrick Reagin
Prior to Doiron, the test for maritime contracts in the Fifth Circuit was a complex fact-intensive six-factor inquiry, established in Davis & Sons, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Jan 2018, 7:41 am by Steven Boutwell
Everage For nearly 30 years, district courts within the US 5th Circuit have evaluated whether maritime or state law applies to oil and gas service contracts using the 6-factor test from Davis & Sons, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Jan 2018, 3:00 am by John Jenkins
Here’s the intro: On December 5, 2017, Magistrate Judge Jonathan Goodman in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida held in SEC v. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 9:00 am by Stephen Wermiel
United States, Gorsuch defended the court’s decision to send a case back to the U.S. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 7:34 am by Ben
In the UK in FAPL v BT [2017] Mr Justice Arnold concluded that the High Court has the jurisdiction to make an order against an access provider that would require the ISP to block access not to a website but rather streaming servers giving unauthorised access to copyright content - 'live' blocking. [read post]