Search for: "State v. Files"
Results 1721 - 1740
of 91,588
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Apr 2019, 1:02 pm
To read the State Bar’s response and related filings in McDonald v. [read post]
13 Dec 2013, 9:14 am
Here is the complaint in GlaxoSmithKline LLC v. [read post]
14 Jun 2019, 12:24 pm
The Federal Circuit today ruled that The University of Minnesota (UMN)—an arm of the state of Minnesota—is not protected by state sovereign immunity from a number of inter partes review (IPR) petitions filed against UMN patents. [read post]
31 May 2014, 8:29 am
Joe Tacopina (and Tacopina v. [read post]
10 Sep 2009, 12:03 am
An amicus brief, filed on behalf of state and federal prosecutors, is unpersuasive. [read post]
15 Jun 2018, 6:00 am
Taylor v. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 4:15 am
In Huntsman v. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 1:26 pm
In Taylor v. [read post]
6 Jun 2007, 5:10 am
The SEC has apparently agreed to support the cert petition filed by the shareholders in Regents v. [read post]
9 Aug 2007, 2:34 pm
Quarto v. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 11:59 am
" Biden v. [read post]
13 Oct 2020, 12:38 am
Apple, Inc., No. 20-cv-370535, filed in the Superior Court of California on September 17, 2020That is a state court. [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 10:44 am
Here are the materials in United States v. [read post]
13 Jan 2009, 11:10 am
Quarterman (07-6984), a unanimous Court decided that, if a state prisoner is allowed by a state court to file an appeal that ordinarily would be too late, that will delay the start of the one-year filing period for pursuing a habeas challenge until after the state appeal is resolved. [read post]
13 Oct 2009, 10:18 am
" Dole v. [read post]
8 Dec 2023, 10:52 am
’” United States v. [read post]
12 Sep 2018, 8:46 am
The fourth recently filed lawsuit is Lama v. [read post]
24 Aug 2007, 4:51 pm
Lawyers for detainees at Guantanamo Bay filed merits briefs today in Boumediene v. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 7:19 am
Brooks stated that he has "no idea" whether the Supreme Court will take on Prince v. [read post]
31 Jul 2007, 6:05 am
The brief addressing this question, a concept known as scheme liability, was filed in support of the investors in the Stoneridge case.The brief noted that the Solicitor General rejected the SEC's specific recommendation that the United States file an amicus brief in support of investors and urge the Court to follow the Commission's long-standing interpretation of the statutory and regulatory provisions at issue. [read post]
