Search for: "State v. K. T."
Results 1721 - 1740
of 3,544
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Mar 2015, 8:31 am
State v. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 8:04 am
Part II Forum: The Baka Case Mart Susi, The Baka Case – The Unbearable Price of Individual Justice Gábor Kártyás, The Labour Lawyer’s Reading of the Baka Case Part III Developments in International Law Dinah Shelton, The Benefits and Limitations of a Human Rights Approach to Environmental Protection László Blutman, Law in Mind: Towards an Explanatory Framework for Customary International Law László Burián, Jurisdiction… [read post]
29 Mar 2015, 3:10 pm
Michigan State won the game 76-70. [read post]
29 Mar 2015, 1:03 pm
–State v. [read post]
29 Mar 2015, 4:30 am
F–k Cancer charity founders to face off in B.C. [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 8:12 am
This week, the United States Supreme Court issued a long-awaited ruling in Young v. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 12:44 pm
The Opinion of Advocate General Wahl was published today in Case C‑125/14 Iron & Smith Kft v Unilever NV, a request for a preliminary ruling by the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) from the Hungarian Fővárosi Törvényszék -- that's the Budapest Municipal Court, if you didn't know ["I knew that", said Merpel ...]. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 4:30 am
http://t.co/5FwuTQfV7i -> US states vow to fight Google after the FTC meekly rolls over http://t.co/05SSbWyR2F -> [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 8:09 pm
Hutin YJF, Pool V, Cramer EH, et al. (1999). [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 3:32 am
Such relief is rarely granted under New York law, where, as in the case at bar, the movant would be receiving the ultimate relief pendente lite and could ultimately be compensated through monetary damages, Rosa Hair Stylists Inc. v Jaber Food Corp., 218 AD2d 793 (2d Dep’t 1995); see Matos v City of New York, 21 AD3d 936 (2d Dep’t 2005); Neos v Lacey, 291 AD2d 434 (2d Dep’t 2002). [read post]
22 Mar 2015, 9:01 pm
The First Department held otherwise in its March 19, 2015 decision in Buckingham v. [read post]
22 Mar 2015, 2:17 pm
The code relevant code states: (from DC Code 16-803)(2) (A) If a period of at least 5 years has elapsed since the completion of the movant's sentence for a disqualifying misdemeanor conviction in the District of Columbia or for a conviction in any jurisdiction for an offense that involved conduct that would constitute a disqualifying misdemeanor conviction if committed in the District, the conviction shall not disqualify the movant from filing a motion to seal an arrest and related… [read post]
19 Mar 2015, 7:04 am
Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc., March 17, 2015, Lipez, K.). [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 6:17 am
This was underscored in the 2003 case of State Dept. of Health Services v. [read post]
17 Mar 2015, 10:39 am
Kizer & Jeremy K. [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 4:23 am
The bottom of the form reports local and state tax information. [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 9:07 am
Viacom * 17 USC 512(f) Preempts State Law Claims Over Bogus Copyright Takedown Notices–Amaretto v. [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 7:35 am
Taken by itself and out of context, the question "Is it acceptable that the European Union abandons its powers in favour of the Member States? [read post]
12 Mar 2015, 9:04 am
United States. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 3:53 pm
” Maybe at least putting all his 401(k) funds in cash? [read post]
