Search for: "State v. Mains"
Results 1721 - 1740
of 10,257
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Dec 2009, 10:30 pm
Armfield v. [read post]
21 Jul 2016, 1:22 am
Infringement - The de minimis principle in quia timet actionsThe de minimis principle has been considered in previous patent authorities (Hoechst v BP [1998], Monsanto v Cargill [2007], Napp v Ratiopharm [2009], Lundbeck v Norpharma [2011]). [read post]
19 Aug 2022, 4:42 am
The defendant’s main office is located in Chicago, Illinois. [read post]
11 Dec 2019, 4:00 am
” Broussard v. [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 7:09 pm
People v. [read post]
19 Feb 2018, 12:00 am
In Alden v Maine, 527 US 706, the Supreme Court of the United States found that State sovereign immunity is "implicit in the constitutional design. [read post]
26 Aug 2009, 9:27 pm
This extension of Federal regulation to protect children is occurring at the same time that similar concerns are being expressed by state legislatures, including the adoption of a recent law in Maine that effectively prohibits direct marketing to minors. [read post]
24 Jun 2021, 11:53 am
See Barnes v. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 1:31 pm
Planning to see People v. [read post]
8 Dec 2008, 2:24 pm
United States and O’Neal v. [read post]
9 Apr 2021, 8:49 am
Bopanna and V. [read post]
17 Apr 2011, 4:00 am
The case of the day is SEC v. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 2:06 pm
In Elliott v. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 4:41 pm
The main opinion simply affirms on the basis of Swarthout v. [read post]
10 Jul 2015, 9:10 am
by David Hricik Over on the main page, Dennis has done a good job laying out the court’s “analysis” in Versata v. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 2:12 am
Notably, the Court of Appeal stated that subsequent case law, including Sage v Secretary of State for the Environment [2003] UKHL 22, has placed greater emphasis on the need to view planning permissions as a whole rather than as consent for delineable acts of development. [read post]
15 Mar 2019, 4:34 pm
In State v. [read post]
11 Nov 2009, 1:00 pm
The case is entitled Craft v. [read post]
18 Aug 2017, 9:53 am
Facts: This case (Kerns et al v. [read post]
14 Mar 2015, 8:40 am
I was quoted in his article and there is a brief discussion of United States v. [read post]
