Search for: "State v. Marks"
Results 1721 - 1740
of 19,483
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jun 2018, 7:48 am
Matthew Forys is the chief of staff at Landmark Legal Foundation, which filed an amicus brief in support of Mark Janus in Janus v. [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 9:57 am
In Cosmetic Warriors v. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 3:13 am
Scott Stawski v. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 8:32 am
In Yegiazaryan v. [read post]
22 Oct 2008, 11:05 am
Correction officer trainee dismissed after failing to keep his beard trimmedVales v State of New Jersey, CA3, No. 07-2971, opinion filed August 12, 2008 [marked "Not Precedential" and not published]Juan Valdes, a former corrections officer trainee, was discharged from the New Jersey Department of Corrections Officer Training Program for failing to keep his beard within a one-eighth inch allowance granted to him by the Academy as an accommodation of his religious… [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 2:40 am
Red Hen Bread LLC v. [read post]
13 Dec 2013, 5:01 am
The decisionThe IPO’s decision focused on the words of section 3(1)(b) of the Trade Marks Act 1994, which states that “trade marks which are devoid of any distinctive character” -- an absolute bar to registration that comes from Article 3(1)(b) of the Trade Mark Directive and is paralleled in Article 7(1)(b) of the Community Trade Mark Regulation.The Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) in Case C-37/03 BioID v OHIM… [read post]
17 Mar 2015, 9:33 am
Levanoff, et al. v. [read post]
6 Dec 2009, 3:35 pm
VP Racing Fuels, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Oct 2008, 6:55 pm
Earlier this year the Supreme Court examined the responsibility to appoint counsel in the Texas case Rothgery v. [read post]
8 Oct 2022, 10:00 am
Corp. v. [read post]
28 May 2020, 12:05 am
Interestingly, although the parties had not argued this, the court suggested it had jurisdiction to hear the case against Nestlé BV's parent company on the basis of the CJEU's decision in C-617/15 Nike v. [read post]
23 Sep 2010, 5:54 pm
“El Mundo” had verified with the company’s former accountant that the accounts were genuine and quoted him using quotation marks. [read post]
6 May 2019, 3:52 am
Chicago Cubs Baseball Club, LLC v. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 11:41 am
Facts: This case (Superior Consulting Services, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 11:41 am
Facts: This case (Superior Consulting Services, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Jul 2011, 6:00 am
Roth v. [read post]
2 Oct 2015, 7:08 pm
Regents of New Mexico State University (10th Cir., August 6, 2015) (affirming various judgments against plaintiffs for lack of proper briefing)*Martin v. [read post]
31 Oct 2022, 4:58 am
Grace v. [read post]
7 Apr 2009, 5:22 pm
Mark Randazza comments here on Judge Legrome Davis's recent denial of a motion to dismiss in Ciolli v. [read post]
