Search for: "State v. Perry" Results 1721 - 1740 of 2,364
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jan 2011, 3:19 pm by David Lat
For 2010, readers support his candidacy based on (1) his pathbreaking work in advancing LGBT rights and marriage equality, through litigating Perry v. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 2:13 pm by Christopher Bird
Canada, and then the Supreme Court's reference on same-sex marriage, preceded the legalization of same-sex marriage here, and one hopes that Perry v. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 12:14 pm by Gideon Alper
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued a series of orders and opinions in the Perry v. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 11:17 am by Record on Appeal
” Thus, had there been California law on point (which the court stated it found none) – the intervention of the proponents may have otherwise ended in the same result as Imperial County, its Board, and the Deputy County Clerk. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 4:01 pm by Lyle Denniston
  The certified question issue has now been docketed at the California Supreme Court, under case number S189476, Perry v. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 12:16 pm by David Lat
Here’s the Ninth Circuit’s certification order, available on the court’s Perry v. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 8:36 am by Charley
Many were surprised that the former Bush v. [read post]
1 Jan 2011, 12:01 am by Transplanted Lawyer
The government will attempt to kick-start mortgage lending and consumer credit with loan guarantees to banks; this will result in little economic growth, more bankruptcies, and increased governmental debt.Law and the Courts: The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals will affirm the trial court's ruling in Perry v. [read post]
29 Dec 2010, 12:34 pm by David Doniger
Once again, despite the grandstanding by Texas Governor Rick Perry and other elected leaders, the State has utterly failed to prove its case in the courts. [read post]
26 Dec 2010, 7:10 pm by cdw
” Henry Perry Sireci v. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 5:59 am by Susan Brenner
Perry, 531 F.3d 662 (8th Cir. 2008)). [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 5:09 am by Timothy P. Flynn
  The appellate judge suggested that perhaps the issue could be posed to the California Supreme Court for a determination as to whether California law would allow any entity to stand in as a legal “proxy” for the suit.Perry’s well-heeled lawyers stated in response to the suggestion that even if California law allowed a proxy-style legal fight, the proxy would be unable to demonstrate how they were harmed by lifting the ban against same-sex marriage.Scholars of the… [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 8:35 pm
By Mike Dorf In my latest FindLaw column and my post on Monday, I took issue with the framing of the relevance of Romer v. [read post]