Search for: "State v. Plan"
Results 1721 - 1740
of 29,593
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jun 2017, 8:03 pm
Beekman Delamater Properties, LLC v Village of Rhinebeck Zoning Board of Appeals, 2017 WL 2260271 (NYAD 2 Dept. 5/24/2017)Filed under: Current Caselaw - New York, Site Plan Review, Special Use/Exception, Uncategorized [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 5:51 am
Collective bargaining agreement requires village to reimburse its retirees participating in its health insurance plan their Medicare premiumsMillington v Village of S. [read post]
3 Apr 2015, 7:44 am
The last case of the March argument session, Bullard v. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 1:21 pm
The Preamble to the Regulations states that the IRS views retiree-only plans and COBRA coverage subject to the tax imposed under Code § 4375 and plan sponsors may be required to pay the tax under Code § 4376. [read post]
5 Jan 2017, 9:29 pm
Lucente v. [read post]
7 Aug 2022, 10:03 am
Specifically, that evening, Petitioner texted the Mother asking what she was planning and whether she was going to the United States, and begging her not to take the children away. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 8:12 am
In Mullins v. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 8:14 am
Further, the facts of this case provide ample ground for the suspicions of many who wonder why it is that the United States is so interested in losing its identity and compromising Constitutional principles in order to facilitate some ill conceived plan to join the world community. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 8:33 am
Jackson v. [read post]
4 Jan 2021, 5:23 am
The distinctions with ERISA is that the plan is a plan for employers to offer to employees that is set and governed by Federal Law rather than State Law. [read post]
31 Aug 2017, 12:38 pm
State Water Resources Control Bd. (2011) 52 Cal.4th 499, 527 [citing and following authorities recognizing interlocutory remand procedure]; No Oil, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Aug 2017, 12:38 pm
State Water Resources Control Bd. (2011) 52 Cal.4th 499, 527 [citing and following authorities recognizing interlocutory remand procedure]; No Oil, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Oct 2019, 6:21 am
The PLAN Act would overturn the La Park La Brea v. [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 7:32 am
Richards v. [read post]
5 May 2011, 10:18 am
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) promulgated a final rule partially disapproving the Texas State Implementation Plan (SIP) and issuing a Federal Implementation Plan (FIP) for Texas. [read post]
18 Dec 2006, 3:41 pm
He did not say specifically what was lacking in the stay application (Stroup, et al., v. [read post]
17 Sep 2021, 7:22 am
That divergence is irreconcilable.The text of the Chinese Human Rights Action Plan (2021-2025) follows. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 12:44 pm
WildEarth filed suit in Federal district court challenging the plan and the final environmental impact statement the National Park Service (NPS) prepared in conjunction with the plan. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 8:24 am
In a significant ruling, Florida’s Fourth District Court of Appeal in the case of Ocean Concrete, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 8:24 am
In a significant ruling, Florida’s Fourth District Court of Appeal in the case of Ocean Concrete, Inc. v. [read post]
