Search for: "State v. Pounds" Results 1721 - 1740 of 3,059
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 May 2011, 1:48 am by Melina Padron
NAB, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWHC 1191 (Admin) (13 May 2011)   Man unlawfully detained pending deportation to Iran awarded £75 per day (total £6,150) compensatory damages. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 8:19 pm by Jeff Gamso
 Only the state argued.ONLY THE STATE WON.Yet another true story:After the Supreme Court (US this time) decided Miranda v. [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 9:54 pm by Simon Gibbs
  As Cook on Costs 2009 states: “‘What is proportionality? [read post]
22 Jul 2012, 10:22 pm by Leland E. Beck
  The 2010 NHTSA analysis shows that a 100-pound reduction in weight, while keeping footprint constant, decreases the fatality rate for light trucks over 3,870 pounds but increases the fatality rate for light trucks less than 3,870 pounds and for all passenger cars. [read post]
22 Sep 2015, 8:02 am by Margaret Wood
”  In 1988 Congress passed the  Omnibus Trade and Competitiveness Act, Pub.L. 100-418, Title V, §5164 which stated that the metric system was to be the preferred system for weights and measures in the United States. [read post]
3 Mar 2025, 1:41 am by INFORRM
While the parents argued their actions were not harassment, the case, set for trial in October 2025, was resolved when they agreed to stop their conduct and pay £10,000 in damages and costs. [read post]
15 Mar 2020, 5:36 pm by INFORRM
  The claimant was awarded damages for misuse of private information of £25,000. [read post]
25 Jul 2021, 4:50 pm by INFORRM
Lawrence Sanders, State University of New York at Buffalo. [read post]
22 Dec 2021, 4:22 pm by INFORRM
  We have had nearly 400,000 page views this year, more than half from the UK with the United States, India, Australia and Ireland again making up the rest of the top five. [read post]
13 Oct 2014, 7:30 am by Guest Blogger
  For the health professions, licensing board oversight falls on the cusp between formal state action and collective private governance – an ambiguity that the Supreme Court may clarify this term (North Carolina Dental Board v. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
  However, on 31 January 2011, the solicitors acting for His Holiness wrote to the Court stating that they were “without instructions” in relation to both the application and the appeal and stating that they were in the process of making an application to come off the record. [read post]