Search for: "State v. S. R. R."
Results 1721 - 1740
of 71,790
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jan 2016, 9:23 am
The Supreme Court of the United States yesterday announced its decision in Campbell-Ewald Co. v. [read post]
17 Dec 2007, 5:24 pm
In R v. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 1:08 pm
The defendant's name is James R. [read post]
23 Nov 2010, 9:16 pm
Today’s blog looks at the case of Videchak v. [read post]
17 Oct 2022, 10:01 am
Joseph R. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 1:48 pm
S. 797, 803-806 (1985). [read post]
12 Jul 2016, 10:42 am
R. v. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 4:25 am
Being on the State or a participating employer’s payroll determines eligibility for member service credit in the State's Employees' Retirement SystemMatter of Muccia v DiNapoli, 2010 NY Slip Op 00630, Decided and Entered: January 28, 2010, Appellate Division, Third DepartmentMargaret M. [read post]
W.D.Tenn.: Not unreasonable to put defendant in back of patrol car unhandcuffed while DL was checked
18 Aug 2012, 6:45 am
United States v. [read post]
8 Aug 2015, 5:08 pm
Following R (Jakimaviciute) v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC [2014] EWCA Civ 1438 [our report] and Alemi, R (on the application of) v Westminster City Council [2015] EWHC 1765 (Admin) [our report], it was not permissible to set qualifying [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 1:06 pm
S. 557 (1980), and whether the law can be upheld as a valid disclosure requirement under Zauderer v. [read post]
8 Jan 2023, 8:39 am
Dania V. [read post]
17 Dec 2011, 7:58 am
State v. [read post]
16 Mar 2024, 9:37 pm
At issue was the fact that Green received honoraria and allowances from Calvary Church while in the United States on a B-1 visitor's visa before the R-1 visa was approved. [read post]
24 Jun 2020, 10:49 pm
Show notes are located at www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/122 “THE ROOM WHERE IT HAPPENED” MOVES TOWARDS PUBLICATIONUnited States of America v John R. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 5:30 am
In R (on the application of Naik) v Secretary of State for the Home Department ([2011] EWCA Civ 1546) the Court of Appeal confirmed that the exclusion of an Indian Muslim public speaker from the United Kingdom after making statements which breached the Home Office’s “unacceptable behaviours policy” was lawful, and that any interference with his rights was justified. [read post]
1 Oct 2007, 11:19 am
R. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 5:25 am
The judge then cited a helpful passage from Carnwath LJ in R(Shrewsbury and Atcham Borough Council v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government: 32. [read post]
1 Dec 2009, 7:26 pm
Express Scripts, Inc., Magistrate Judge Frederick R. [read post]
