Search for: "State v. Self"
Results 1721 - 1740
of 15,820
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Mar 2017, 8:35 pm
The petition of the day is: Welch v. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 9:35 am
Corp. v. [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 7:35 am
Pedreira (standing to sue as a state taxpayer). [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 3:41 pm
United States (Tobacco; Federal Taxation) Mitchell, et al. v. [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 3:41 pm
United States (Tobacco; Federal Taxation) Mitchell, et al. v. [read post]
11 May 2020, 11:03 am
After the Supreme Court denied as moot the closely watched Second Amendment case New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
13 Jul 2018, 11:28 am
Dating to 1976’s Buckley v. [read post]
24 Nov 2020, 8:40 am
Cite to Spy Phones v. [read post]
14 Jan 2012, 6:00 am
The answer to that question determines whether state employees can sue states for damages for violating the self-care provision. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 6:00 am
In RE: GRAND JURY SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM DATED MARCH 25, 2011 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. [read post]
8 May 2024, 1:28 pm
United States: Tribal self-determination, safety, and the necessary role of the dual-sovereignty doctrine. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 9:07 am
R. v. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 8:00 am
According to petitioners, “investors . . . associated with state government and labor unions . . . often appear to be driven by concerns other than a desire to increase the economic performance of the companies in which they invest. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 4:15 pm
Mediacom Southeast LLC v. [read post]
11 Oct 2010, 8:20 am
In Nollan v. [read post]
12 Apr 2019, 1:01 am
In NLRB v Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp, 301 U.S. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 3:57 pm
You see UCLA is a public college, meaning that it not only receives a large chunk of its funding from the state of California, but under National Collegiate Athletic Association v. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 3:14 am
Das Völkerrecht ist geprägt durch die Relativität der Rechtsbeziehungen. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 9:23 am
In Friends of Eel River (my July 31, 2017 post on which can be found here), the Supreme Court held that another federal law – the Interstate Commerce Commission Termination Act of 1995 (“ICCTA”) – does not preempt CEQA’s application to a railroad project undertaken by a state public entity on a rail line also owned by that state entity; it reasoned that even though a state’s imposition of environmental regulations like CEQA on a… [read post]
1 Jun 2020, 1:12 pm
Defendant owns and operates self-storage facilities throughout the country and conducts lien sales in California pursuant to the Self-Service Storage Facility Act. [read post]
