Search for: "State v. Wood" Results 1721 - 1740 of 2,674
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Sep 2023, 12:56 pm by Jeff Gamso
  He accidentally hit a bit of wood, sliced a chunk of skin off her head, and knocked her out of the chair. [read post]
7 May 2020, 5:29 am by Annsley Merelle Ward
The AusKat won't be restrained fromlaunching to attack that wrinkle on thesheets.....In a long-awaited judgment that will affect applications in Australia for interlocutory injunctions to restrain launch of pharmaceutical products, as well as claims for compensation following wrongful exclusion of generic or biosimilar pharmaceuticals from the market, the Federal Court of Australia dismissed a claim made by the Commonwealth government for compensation from Sanofi (Commonwealth of Australia… [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 3:42 pm by Lisa Larrimore Ouellette
Pedraza-Fariña states that patent law is the Federal Circuit's "perceived area of expertise" and she notes that non-patent areas are "characterized by high affirmance rates and deferential standards of review. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 4:52 am by Marty Lederman
Most of my previous posts here about Hobby Lobby and Conestoga Wood have been devoted to the question of whether the plaintiffs have adequately alleged that federal law imposes a "substantial burden" on their exercise of religion--the threshold question under RFRA. [read post]
16 Mar 2017, 7:08 pm
The Post WW2 Context  (Pix Establishment of the Bretton Woods System)In the decades following WW2, the U.S. became the Chief Architect of the present legal and economic orders along with a coalition of allies. [read post]
24 Aug 2022, 6:16 am by Ezequiel Heffes
Focusing on NSAGs, Wood has identified that civilian victimization is “anticipated during moments in which the viability of [an armed group] is threatened or when it faces significant military setbacks” (at p. 15). [read post]
19 Jul 2011, 10:12 am by Rosalind English
Together with this, the test laid down by Laws LJ in  R(Wood) v Commissioner of the Metropolis  provides a firm guiding hand to this notoriously difficult balancing act: First, the alleged threat or assault to the individual’s personal autonomy must (if article 8 is to be engaged) attain ‘a certain level of seriousness’. [read post]
18 Jul 2022, 8:33 am by David M. McLain
Recently, the United States District Court for the District of Colorado interpreted a faulty workmanship exclusion in a property insurance policy in The Lodge at Mountain Village Owner Association v. [read post]
15 Jan 2010, 10:26 am by Jon
States are barred by a Supreme Court precedent, Massachusetts v. [read post]