Search for: "State v. Word"
Results 1721 - 1740
of 40,639
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Aug 2012, 6:41 am
Citing with approval the recent judgment of the International Court of Justice (“ICJ”) in Jurisdictional Immunities of the State (Germany v. [read post]
24 Mar 2012, 1:17 pm
This question is not always so simple, as indicated by a recent case in Nova Scotia, Jollimore Estate v. [read post]
9 Jan 2020, 4:56 pm
" Janet Reno, the two words KFR hates to hear, trusted her prosecutors to make the correct decisions in court. [read post]
11 Jul 2008, 5:00 pm
Grimes v. [read post]
31 May 2017, 7:01 am
The United States Supreme Court, in BNSF Railway Co. v. [read post]
6 Mar 2015, 3:53 am
In United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 12:23 pm
Whatever the rationale for his Trump v. [read post]
7 Feb 2011, 5:00 am
Co. v. [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 8:58 am
As judicial elections in recent years have become, in the words of Roy Schotland, "noisier, nastier, and costlier," litigants have consistently sought to limit some of the excesses sometimes seen in judicial elections, which 39 states use for at least... [read post]
10 Feb 2020, 2:58 pm
Due to the Supreme Court of the United States’ Ruling in Birchfield v. [read post]
4 Jun 2013, 8:00 am
But on the 50-year anniversary of Gideon v. [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 1:38 pm
" The Fourteenth Amendment is understood to extend this limitation to state legislatures.Note the wording carefully. [read post]
23 Jun 2008, 10:04 am
Much ink has already been spilled about the MedellÃÂn v. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 10:00 am
This is pursuant to Kumar v. [read post]
18 Jul 2016, 7:36 am
Witness statements said he was called N-word. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 11:30 pm
A. v. [read post]
2 Dec 2022, 3:00 am
Matthews Church of God & Christ v. [read post]
28 Jul 2022, 10:01 am
From U.S. v. [read post]
12 Aug 2020, 1:30 pm
District Court for the State of Maine issued an order granting a motion to suppress evidence in United States of America v. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 10:13 am
In other words, although California has not adopted the federal de minimis doctrine, does some version of the doctrine nonetheless apply to wage and hour claims as a matter of state law? [read post]
