Search for: "Strong v. Strong"
Results 1721 - 1740
of 19,586
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Oct 2008, 6:51 pm
I didn't have a strong preexisting feeling on the merits of the dispute, but in the end, I was entirely persuaded that Judge Fisher was right. [read post]
9 Sep 2013, 12:29 pm
In this recent case, Schubert v. [read post]
28 Mar 2007, 12:24 pm
This morning, lawyers in Tellabs, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 7:23 am
From Harrington v. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 2:18 pm
In California v. [read post]
19 Aug 2015, 1:30 am
The Supreme Court in R (Tigere) v Secretary of State for Business Innovation and Skills [2015] UKSC 57 held by a 3:2 majority that the blanket requirement that all applicants for a student loan have “indefinite leave to remain” is discriminatory and must be amended by the Government. [read post]
8 Apr 2010, 7:30 pm
In Dadd v. [read post]
22 Mar 2023, 7:51 am
Social clubs must be supported by membership fees, dues, and assessments.[26] Most museums’ governance make-up and membership structure could be seen as a characteristic of a 501(c)(7) social club rather than a 501(c)(3) charitable nonprofit.[27] In American Campaign Academy v. [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 9:24 pm
This suggests some core criteria that should be present whenever any regulation of tool providers is considered: 1) strong social consensus that there are concrete and significant harms to be addressed; 2) strong consensus that obligations should apply equally across all providers; 3) strong consensus the regulation is appropriately tailored and enforceable as a technical and practical matter. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 2:29 pm
Justice Gorsuch with opinion in U.S. v. [read post]
16 Oct 2017, 4:08 pm
The Court could not discern any strong reasons to substitute its own view for that of the national courts. [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 6:21 am
Although (1) the parties voluntarily agreed to the Consent Decree, (2) the NIGC initially endorsed the Agreements, and (3) the NIGC may lack authority to punish the Band for its compliance with the Consent Decree, those factors are outweighed by (4) the strong congressional intent that tribes be the primary beneficiaries of gaming revenues, (5) the fact that the Band’s obligation to pay rent under the Agreements is now considered—by the agency tasked with making such… [read post]
5 Aug 2008, 8:15 pm
My strong recommendation is nonetheless that you should not let people buy Ecstacy from you through the admittedly expedient means of sending you a text message.Here's one reason why. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 5:45 am
This all played out in Ricci v. [read post]
3 Jun 2013, 11:45 am
(People v. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 1:24 pm
Regards, Roy] Walmart v. [read post]
22 May 2010, 6:23 am
Everson v. [read post]
27 Dec 2023, 5:25 am
Eastern District of North Carolina Judge Richard Myers in Nutt v. [read post]
3 May 2017, 4:50 am
Dean v. [read post]
