Search for: "Taylor v. Taylor"
Results 1721 - 1740
of 4,350
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Dec 2021, 8:00 am
"Pursuant to this duty to negotiate, where a past practice between a public employer and its current employees is established, involving a mandatory subject of negotiation, the Taylor Law would bar the employer from discontinuing that practice without prior negotiation" (Matter of Aeneas McDonald Police Benevolent Assn. v City of Geneva, 92 NY2d 326, 331), and "PERB is authorized to determine disputes as to improper employment practices, and to take affirmative… [read post]
23 Dec 2021, 8:00 am
"Pursuant to this duty to negotiate, where a past practice between a public employer and its current employees is established, involving a mandatory subject of negotiation, the Taylor Law would bar the employer from discontinuing that practice without prior negotiation" (Matter of Aeneas McDonald Police Benevolent Assn. v City of Geneva, 92 NY2d 326, 331), and "PERB is authorized to determine disputes as to improper employment practices, and to take affirmative… [read post]
3 Jun 2009, 4:32 am
To succeed on their motion for summary judgment, the defendants were required to establish, through the submission of evidentiary proof in admissible form, that the plaintiff is unable to prove at least one of the essential elements of the cause of action (see Suydam v O'Neill, 276 AD2d 549; Ostriker v Taylor, Atkins & Ostrow, 258 AD2d 572). [read post]
12 Feb 2019, 11:58 am
The case Nancy Wells v. [read post]
13 Sep 2018, 12:11 pm
Facts: This case (EDMOND v. [read post]
12 Feb 2019, 11:58 am
The case Nancy Wells v. [read post]
21 Jan 2013, 7:47 am
In the recent case (Dhillon v. [read post]
4 Mar 2013, 8:03 am
This reasoning was adopted by the Newfoundland Court of Appeal in Taylor v. [read post]
9 Mar 2010, 3:49 am
Union can require non-members to contribute to union’s legal feesLocke et al. v. [read post]
24 Jun 2008, 3:48 am
Supreme Court granted certiorari, vacated the Fourth Circuit's judgment, and remanded the case for further consideration in light of the Supreme Court's recent ruling in Taylor v. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 4:58 am
United States v. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 3:03 am
After holding that “the subject of the claim sought to be arbitrated is the type authorized by the Taylor Law,” the Appellate Division explained: Contrary to the District's contention, an arbitrator's award in favor of the Association would not violate public policy. [read post]
29 Jul 2009, 4:10 am
Employer's setting out the nature of acts of misconduct that adversely impact upon the "efficiency of the service" criticalDoe v. [read post]
6 Oct 2023, 8:00 am
(Taylor Bus Service, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Jul 2014, 7:00 am
LEXIS 89225 (ED PA, June 30, 2014), a Pennsylvania federal district court dismissed a Muslim inmate's complaint that he was unable to pray on a single day when he was kept in handcuffs for over two hours.In Taylor v. [read post]
15 Dec 2008, 12:05 pm
" Thus, according to the opinion, the district went too far in its efforts to secure a drug-free learning environment.Also, the Appellate Division, First Department, in considering Patchogue-Medford, said that in the absence of a (Taylor Law) contract requirement that teachers submit themselves to such tests, a compulsory test for the presence of illegal drugs is a search within the meaning of the 4th Amendment. [read post]
14 May 2010, 6:18 am
Ceaser, 304 So.2d 855 (La.App. 4th Cir. 1974); and Taylor v. [read post]
27 Oct 2008, 11:30 am
., L.P. v APCC Services, Inc, Republic of the Philippines v Pimentel, and Taylor v Sturgell - broke little new ground. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 7:11 am
Florida and Miller v. [read post]
17 Jan 2008, 8:49 am
Omicron Capital, LLC v. [read post]
