Search for: "Thomas v. State"
Results 1721 - 1740
of 13,926
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Mar 2013, 6:45 am
AMP v. [read post]
18 May 2023, 1:21 pm
Twitter, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Nov 2022, 9:30 pm
That stark advice would echo twenty-five years later in Judge Ruffin’s notorious opinion in the slave law case of State v. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 6:06 pm
In the recent appellate decision of Commonwealth v. [read post]
11 May 2023, 9:23 am
The case that came out this morning is National Pork Producers Council v. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 11:03 am
United States, a unanimous opinion from Justice Thomas, held “a federal sentencing court must determine whether ‘an offense under State law’ is a ’serious drug offense’ by consulting the ‘maximum term of imprisonment’ applicable to a defendant’s prior state drug offense at the time of the defendant’s conviction for that offense. [read post]
20 Mar 2018, 9:01 pm
In those other cases—chiefly Loving v. [read post]
12 May 2023, 2:54 pm
S. 267, 279 (1978), and "try novel social and economic experiments" if they wish, New State Ice Co. v. [read post]
27 Mar 2016, 11:40 pm
At the National Conference of State Legislatures, Soronen summarizes last week’s decision in the class action case Tyson Foods v. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 5:56 am
The United States Supreme Court heard oral argument yesterday in Maples v. [read post]
20 Jun 2015, 8:16 am
The Supreme Court’s recent decision in Davis v. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 3:10 am
(The only Justice still serving on the Court who took part is Clarence Thomas, who dissented.) [read post]
12 Sep 2016, 11:00 am
For Justice Thomas, nothing done by a state or local government, ever could violate the Establishment Clause. [read post]
14 May 2010, 8:46 am
Category: Recent Decisions;Criminal Opinions Body: State v. [read post]
25 Mar 2019, 12:36 pm
This morning I attended oral argument at the United States Supreme Court in the maritime case of Dutra Group v. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 12:13 pm
In a separate concurrence, Thomas also reiterated his longtime argument that the Establishment Clause should not apply to local and state governments; in other words, states and cities should be able to establish religion as they see fit.Now that Lemon is history, we are left to ask what is next. [read post]
22 Apr 2009, 6:41 am
Stanford student Jacob Heller summarizes Monday's argument in Republic of Iraq v. [read post]
25 May 2021, 11:18 am
ShareJust four weeks after hearing oral argument, the Supreme Court on Monday issued a refreshingly clear, unanimous decision in Guam v. [read post]
14 Apr 2020, 12:00 am
In Kahler v. [read post]
28 Oct 2009, 10:18 am
Attorneys Thomas A. [read post]
