Search for: "U.S. v. Chambers" Results 1721 - 1740 of 2,747
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Mar 2013, 4:02 am by John L. Welch
Nike, Finding Counterclaim MootForeign Trademark Owner Stumbles over U.S. [read post]
16 May 2022, 10:34 am by Katherine Pompilio
West, Brookings senior fellow; Isabel V. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 10:57 am by admin
The Agency’s response to any comments received will be available for public inspection at the U.S. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 1:44 pm by WIMS
Jan 18: In a surprising Wall Street Journal Op-Ed, President Obama announced a new Executive Order -- "Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review" -- calling for a government-wide review of regulations, regulatory improvement, elimination of unnecessary paperwork and a special focus on eliminating burdens for small business. [read post]
11 Dec 2016, 5:00 am by Barry Sookman
Equustek in the SCC – Webcast Live December 6, 2016 at 9:30 AM ET https://t.co/hsQLadCTlS -> Australian creators launch campaign against proposed copyright reform https://t.co/p5LabApkIb -> Latest news | US to hold public meeting on copyright marketplace https://t.co/fadun1fwO1 -> Free speech vs. copyright in Supreme Court battle between Google and B.C. firm https://t.co/QZKlXgxd1l -> Delhi HC reserves verdict on publishers’ appeal in photocopy case https://t.co/EgIr4CkRjN… [read post]
3 May 2022, 7:52 pm by Florian Mueller
I'd have to re-read the patent document to be 100% sure, but at this point I strongly suspect that this patent lacks a clear boundary and would, therefore, be indefinite by (strict) U.S. standards.The reason for which I believe the patent doesn't map to the 4G/5G specs is that "decreasing and increasing" are mathematically clear directions (numbers go down or up), which depending on the segment of a chart that you look at would give you roughly the shape of a V… [read post]
20 Jan 2021, 5:01 am by Jacob Schulz
They made a beeline for the chamber, looking for members of Congress. [read post]
20 Nov 2018, 1:58 pm by Eugene Volokh
Policing such behavior, the court concludes, is a matter for the states, because it isn't authorized as a regulation of commerce or as necessary and proper to comply with treaties.The decision, handed down today, is U.S. v. [read post]
20 Nov 2018, 1:58 pm by Eugene Volokh
Policing such behavior, the court concludes, is a matter for the states, because it isn't authorized as a regulation of commerce or as necessary and proper to comply with treaties.The decision, handed down today, is U.S. v. [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 11:29 pm by Kirk Jenkins
Like the plaintiff’s amici we considered here, the plaintiff relies heavily upon the U.S. [read post]
11 Apr 2017, 3:01 pm
The course begins with issues of definitions and of variations in approaches to legal and other governance mechanisms in the U.S. and among major commercial jurisdictions. [read post]