Search for: "UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE" Results 1721 - 1740 of 6,104
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Apr 2019, 6:56 pm by Dan Harris
A few weeks later, the foreign company has its products seized at the China border for violating someone’s trademark or design patent. [read post]
25 Apr 2019, 12:46 pm by Jo Dale Carothers
  Specifically, after learning from several years of AIA trial proceedings, including IPRs, the PTAB created the POP, which serves two main purposes:  1) to rehear certain matters and 2) to assist the Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”) in determining whether a PTAB decision should be designated as a “precedential” or “informative” decision rather than a… [read post]
23 Apr 2019, 12:43 pm by Mike Mireles
Prometheus decisions by the United States Patent and Trademark Office and some judges of the U.S. [read post]
23 Apr 2019, 3:54 am by Edith Roberts
At SCOTUS OA, Tonja Jacobi and Matthew Sag write that the court “seemed considerably less inclined to allow the [Patent and Trademark Office] to prohibit swear words than to prohibit racial slurs. [read post]
22 Apr 2019, 9:16 am by Elizabeth A. Patton
Earlier this month, at the request of the United States Patent and Trademark Office, the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals officially set a trademark registration requirement by making an earlier ruling precedential. [read post]
21 Apr 2019, 2:30 pm by David Lat
Patent and Trademark Office's utterly incoherent approach to supposedly "immoral or scandalous" trademarks, filed by William Jay and Goodwin Procter on behalf of law professors Barton Beebe and Jeanne Fromer. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 9:47 am by Eileen McDermott
For example, Russ Slifer, former Deputy Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), described the framework as “a big swing and a miss. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 9:47 am by Eileen McDermott
For example, Russ Slifer, former Deputy Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), described the framework as “a big swing and a miss. [read post]
17 Apr 2019, 11:15 am by IPWatchdog
Brunetti (Case No. 18-302), the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) is appealing to the Supreme Court from a U.S. [read post]
17 Apr 2019, 11:15 am by IPWatchdog
Brunetti (Case No. 18-302), the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) is appealing to the Supreme Court from a U.S. [read post]
17 Apr 2019, 11:15 am by IPWatchdog
Brunetti (Case No. 18-302), the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) is appealing to the Supreme Court from a U.S. [read post]
17 Apr 2019, 6:01 am by James Yang
Step 1: File an application for patent with the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) Step 2: Examination of patent application Step 3: Respond to any objections or rejections made by the examiner Step 4: Patent grant Read more about each step and what you ought to do before and during each step. [read post]
17 Apr 2019, 3:49 am by Edith Roberts
First up is United States v. [read post]
16 Apr 2019, 2:00 am by DONALD SCARINCI
Patent and Trademark Office’s (USPTO) refusal of Erik Brunetti’s application to register the mark “FUCT” for his clothing line. [read post]
12 Apr 2019, 1:01 pm by Jason Rantanen
McCoy Midwest Regional United States Patent and Trademark Office, will talk about the new 101 guidelines, design patents and USPTO policies. [read post]
3 Apr 2019, 10:54 pm by Florian Mueller
The ITC exclusion order (U.S. import ban) is what Qualcomm really wanted, and the motion for reconsideration will most likely be denied by the ITC, so Qualcomm needs a successful appeal to the Federal Circuit.Time is not on Qualcomm's side in another regard: Apple has been quite successful petitioning the Patent Trial & Appeal Board (PTAB) of the United States Patent & Trademark Office (USPTO) for the institution of inter partes… [read post]
3 Apr 2019, 5:15 am by Robert Levy
Cir 2018), now seems to recognize an equitable defense (“business misconduct”) separate from inequitable conduct to penalize patentees for unethical behavior committed outside of the confines of patent prosecution before the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). [read post]