Search for: "US v. CLARK "
Results 1721 - 1740
of 3,120
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jul 2013, 1:41 pm
The number in parens is the number of times I've used the tag. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 10:14 am
The copies temporarily retained on the screen or in the cache are merely an incidental consequence of using a computer to view the material. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 6:05 am
Lord Clarke gives the leading judgment. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 4:53 am
Clark, 46 Ill.App.3d 240, 360 N.E.2d 1160 (Illinois Court of Appeals 1977). [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 6:01 pm
” (R. v. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 5:02 pm
The closest Justice Thomas comes is citing to Clark v. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 1:04 pm
Clark (2002) 103 Cal.App.4th 1409, 1420 [the death of an important witness may constitute prejudice]; Stafford v. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 6:57 am
On the subject of the judge's errors this Kat notes that the Court of Appeal, having found some errors in the trial judge's judgment, and that Lewison LJ, giving judgment for the Court, approved the words of Lord Mance in Datec Electronics Holdings Ltd v United Parcels Service Ltd [2007] UKHL 23, approving a passage from the judgment of Clarke LJ in Assicurazioni Generali SpA v Arab Insurance Group [2002] EWCA Civ 1642: "...In some cases… [read post]
22 Jun 2013, 7:00 am
Circuit’s opinions in Hussain v. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 3:54 am
The Court of Justice by its judgment dated 15 September 2011 gave its response: British Airways plc v Williams (Case C-155/10) [2012] ICR 847. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 3:54 am
The Court of Justice by its judgment dated 15 September 2011 gave its response: British Airways plc v Williams (Case C-155/10) [2012] ICR 847. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 3:54 am
The Court of Justice by its judgment dated 15 September 2011 gave its response: British Airways plc v Williams (Case C-155/10) [2012] ICR 847. [read post]
12 Jun 2013, 11:44 pm
Over at Popehat, Clark wrote "Edward Snowden, F____ yeah!" [read post]
9 Jun 2013, 8:36 am
Clark Holdings Ltd. v HOOPP Realty Inc. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 2:43 pm
In a neat segue from rubber to plastic, the IPKat wonders how many readers have yet encountered Taylor v Taylor Made Plastics, a curious decision of the US District Court in Tampa, Florida, which marries -- if that be the appropriate word -- the doctrines of IP and family law. [read post]
27 May 2013, 10:02 am
Lancaster, in Clark v. [read post]
27 May 2013, 12:48 am
The team of judges consisted of Lords Neuberger, Clarke, Sumption, Reed and Carnwath and this was an appeal against a decision going all the way back to April 2011 (noted here by Matt the Kat). [read post]
22 May 2013, 5:19 pm
Simpson’s Petition was filed with the Clark County District Court over a year ago on May 12, 2012. [read post]
17 May 2013, 5:07 am
U.S. v. [read post]
