Search for: "US v. Green" Results 1721 - 1740 of 6,076
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Nov 2016, 7:04 am by Maria Kendrick
By Maria Kendrick The much awaited High Court judgment of 3 November 20161)R Miller v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union [2016] EWHC 2768 (Admin). was an historical decision which saw the Executive’s use of prerogative powers delineated in the context of Treaty making, and unmaking, in a successful Judicial Review against the Government. [read post]
29 Nov 2013, 5:10 am
Similarities can be drawn with the recent case of Fenty v Arcadia Group Brands Ltd (t/a Topshop) [discussed by the IPKat here] in which the pop star Rihanna succeeded in her claim for passing off against the retail moguls Topshop, who used her image on a T-shirt without her permission (although Topshop thought they were on solid ground by getting a licence from the photographer to use the picture). [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 12:00 am
Budejovicky Budvar Narodni Podnik v Anheuser-Busch Inc (Class 46) (IPKat) EPO: Should green technology be subject to compulsory licensing? [read post]
28 Aug 2024, 4:28 am by Monty Birley
SFL Ace 2 Co Inc v DCW Management Ltd (formerly Allseas Global Management Ltd) (the “M/V Green Ace”) Facts The Green Ace concerned a claim by shipowners against a parent company under a parent company guarantee said to have been given to secure the performance of its subsidiary’s (the charterers’) obligations under a charterparty. [read post]
13 Dec 2015, 4:01 pm
**********PREVIOUSLY, ON NEVER TOO LATENever too late 75 [week ending on Sunday 6 December] –  BHG on blocking injunctions | IP in Universities | Sweden on blocking injunctions | Canadian musings on patents | US Senate and trade secret reform | Chinese IP Courts | G1/14 referral and Article 108 EPC | PACE procedure (Procedure for Accelerated Conduct of Examination) ant the EPO | Greekat and trade mark partenalism | EPO Boards of Appeal tell AC:… [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 9:11 am by Francis Davey
See our comments on Barney v Eastern Green Ltd and Shersby v Grenehurst neither of which were cited in Windermere Marina Village. [read post]
10 Aug 2016, 8:40 am
Green, 94 Wn.2d 216, 221-222, 616 P.2d 628 (Washington Supreme Court 1980). [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 6:44 am by Joel R. Brandes
Since 2003, she held a United States Permanent Resident Card (also known as a green card), which she used each time she entered the United States. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 9:10 am by Don Cruse
Private pipelines: Eminent domain cannot be used for purely private use Texas Rice Land Partners Ltd., et al. v. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 12:49 am by Marie Louise
Hologic (Docket Report) Intematix – New Intematix LED patent has its customers covered (Green Patent Blog) Stambler- First post-bench/bar order on e-mail discovery limits: Stambler v. [read post]