Search for: "United States v. Article of Drug" Results 1721 - 1740 of 2,497
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Oct 2011, 3:20 am by SHG
It merely provides that payment for junk must be in the form of a check, which in turn is payable in United States currency. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 1:39 pm by FDABlog HPM
Koustas – We have previously reported (here, here, here, and here) on the court struggle in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia (“the Court”) between FDA and Regenerative Sciences, Inc. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 11:02 am
Under federal case-law including United States Supreme Court precedent, law enforcement is given significantly greater latitude in extending the length and scope of a traffic stop. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 11:41 am by Christopher Mathews
  The Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals tackled that somewhat messy issue with its recent decision and order in United States v. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 6:09 am by David Dirr
This article was published in the September 30, 2011 issue of Health Lawyers Weekly, a publication of the American Health Lawyers Association. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 10:00 pm by 1 Crown Office Row
R (on the application of S) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWHC 2120 (Admin) - read judgment The High Court has found that the Secretary of State unlawfully detained a mentally ill foreign national who was awaiting deportation. [read post]
24 Sep 2011, 3:58 am
The Bakanovases did not leave the United States, and in January 2007 they were arrested on immigration charges and released on bond. [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 2:59 am
 There is no explicit language about import alerts in the Act or in the regulations promulgated under the Act.[19]   However, in FDA's Regulatory Procedures Manual, FDA asserts that "Congress authorized FDA to refuse admission of regulated articles based on information, other than the results of examination of samples, that causes an article to appear to violate the FD&C Act. [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 4:07 am
The travelers truthfully explained that the funds were legal gambling proceeds, not evidence of drug transactions. [read post]