Search for: "United States v. Breyer"
Results 1721 - 1740
of 3,533
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jan 2015, 9:33 am
USA, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 10:56 am
Those efforts got a huge boost from the Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 11:59 am
Arguing on behalf of the United States, Assistant to the Solicitor General Rachel Kovner seemed to make somewhat inconsistent arguments. [read post]
14 Jan 2015, 4:46 am
United States, it upheld the conviction of a fleeing bank robber who broke into an elderly woman’s home and instructed her to go with him to her computer room – four to nine feet away – so that police would not see him. [read post]
13 Jan 2015, 2:25 pm
United States ex rel. [read post]
13 Jan 2015, 2:07 pm
At Monday’s oral arguments in ONEOK, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Jan 2015, 9:41 am
The judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit was vacated and the case remanded for further proceedings.Justice Breyer’s opinion was joined by Chief Justice Roberts and Justices Scalia, Kennedy, Ginsburg, Sotomayor, and Kagan. [read post]
27 Dec 2014, 2:00 pm
United States, 572 U.S.___(2014). [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 6:00 am
… “It’s not such a terrible thing to go on the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
12 Dec 2014, 7:43 am
Wong and United States v. [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 7:46 am
Elaine Goldenberg, representing the United States, which filed an amicus brief in support of neither party, also disagreed with the state’s position on comparison class. [read post]
5 Dec 2014, 8:35 pm
The United States (DOJ and PTO) argued that cert should be granted on this issue, agreeing with Commil that issues of validity are irrelevant to infringement. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 11:05 am
Chappell, 14-6264, likewise ended in denial, though not without criticism from Justice Sotomayor (joined by Justice Breyer) of the state’s foot-dragging in providing post-conviction counsel for petitioner’s state habeas claim. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 8:09 am
(Dickerson v. [read post]
2 Dec 2014, 6:34 pm
United States. [read post]
2 Dec 2014, 4:00 am
United States v. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 11:13 am
United States would be difficult for everyone, Justices and lawyers alike, became clear just seconds after the hearing opened. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 11:12 am
United States, about threats on Facebook – the Justices themselves took with enthusiasm to the first case. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 6:41 am
United States, No. 13-10639, two Justices -- Anthony M. [read post]
28 Nov 2014, 7:01 am
This speech is thus entitled to even greater First Amendment protection than the speech at issue in [United States v. [read post]
