Search for: "United States v. Generes" Results 1721 - 1740 of 34,585
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jul 2024, 8:26 am by John McFarland
Ammonite Oil & Gas, owned by William Osborn (my first cousin) leases riverbeds and stranded State tracts from the General Land Office and works to get them included in adjacent pooled units. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 11:30 am
Here's a case where a Ninth Circuit panel whose prior opinion was summarily reversed by the Supreme Court says it'd be just fine were the Court to do so again.I was actually thinking last week about what a generally frivolous waste it is for litigants to file rehearing petitions in the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
17 Aug 2018, 8:41 am by Native American Rights Fund
United States Department of Veterans Affairs (Health Care Costs - Veterans) United States v. [read post]
5 Nov 2007, 9:01 pm
United States (06-1164), asking whether the Tucker Act's six-year statute of limitations is jurisdictional (and may thus not be waived by the parties). [read post]
21 Apr 2018, 9:53 am by Eugene Volokh
On October 10, 2017, I rejected the proffered plea agreement in United States v. [read post]
24 Nov 2023, 11:24 am by Joel R. Brandes
In short, the Amber Alert was no evidence that A.B.M. was (or remains) outside of Mexico, let alone that she was (or remains) in the United States. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 6:08 am by Bradley Graveline
On June 17, 2013, the United States Supreme Court announced a rule that blurs the lines between antitrust and patent law in the context of Hatch-Waxman litigation. [read post]
27 Mar 2009, 5:23 am
United States, the Supreme Court wrestled with how to make sense of what went on behind closed doors in a jury deliberation that produced several acquittals but also deadlocked on other factually related counts. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:58 am by MBettman
State, 2018-Ohio-2358 (The General Assembly has authority to enact any law that is not prohibited by the Ohio or United States Constitutions.) [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 10:26 am by Aaron Bruhl
United States, 399 U.S. 522, 522 (1970) (vacating and remanding with instructions to dismiss the indictment “[o]n the basis of a confession of error by the Solicitor General and of an independent review of the record”); Baxa v. [read post]