Search for: "Voter v. Voter" Results 1721 - 1740 of 6,762
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jan 2008, 2:42 pm
In a unanimous decision in the case, Palmore v. [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 2:06 pm by MTTLR Blog Editor
This report was submitted to the New Jersey Superior Court in support of the plaintiffs in Gusciora v. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 12:34 pm by Bill Raftery
This fall voters in Oregon will get a chance via Measure 78 to redefine their existing “departments” as “branches”. [read post]
17 Nov 2009, 8:56 am
11/11/09 discovery order by Judge Walker: On November 2nd, Judge Walker held a hearing on a discovery dispute in Perry v. [read post]
18 Jan 2021, 8:15 am by Steve Gottlieb
Some things sadden us: Cries of election rigging started long before anything happened perhaps because Republicans had spent years very publicly trying to rig the election against Democrats by excluding or gerrymandering Democratic voters. [read post]
29 Jan 2008, 10:35 am
  The Supreme Court said something similar in Purcell v. [read post]
19 Nov 2020, 8:42 am by The Law Office of James P. Yudes, P.C.
Very few of us are neutral regarding issues of: voter fraud, election interference, or the quality and character of candidates. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 4:30 pm
Forthrightly, I'm not certain at all that the voters were, in fact, fully "aware" of the way the California treated various prisoners when it passed the underlying initiative (in fact, I'm extremely confident that they weren't), but I understand and appreciate that we pretend that they were when we seek to harmonize various statutory provisions.I just have one question.Imagine that you're a lawyer -- as, indeed, most of you are. [read post]
18 Mar 2021, 9:34 am by Eric Goldman
Twitter First Voters Reject Tulsi Gabbard, Then a Judge Does–Gabbard v. [read post]
22 Jun 2024, 10:01 pm by rhapsodyinbooks
The Supreme Court took up the case of whether the city violated the Fifth Amendment’s takings clause in Kelo v. [read post]
21 Aug 2017, 7:08 am by Andrew Hamm
Philip Randolph Institute, in which the Supreme Court will consider Ohio’s maintenance of its voter rolls under the National Voter Registration Act and the Help America Vote Act. [read post]