Search for: "Washington v. District of Columbia" Results 1721 - 1740 of 1,802
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Sep 2007, 10:01 am
Last week, D.C. officials appealed to the Court (District of Columbia v. [read post]
8 Sep 2007, 6:07 am
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit voted 2 to 1 in March to throw out the District's law, which prohibits handgun ownership except by active and retired law enforcement officers. [read post]
5 Sep 2007, 9:57 am
This District of Columbia's Court of Appeals' 31 page opinion can be found under Townsend v. [read post]
5 Sep 2007, 9:57 am
This District of Columbia's Court of Appeals' 31 page opinion can be found under Townsend v. [read post]
4 Sep 2007, 1:32 pm
Also, not related to District of Columbia v. [read post]
4 Sep 2007, 8:32 am
The Court has now docketed District of Columbia v. [read post]
10 Aug 2007, 7:53 am
The Court, on November 21st., agreed to rehear the case, vacating the May 2nd. decision.Disagreeing with its early decision, the Court last Tuesday affirmed the District Court's decision and citing Washington v. [read post]
10 Aug 2007, 6:35 am
He pointed out that by the end of February 2008, "well before this case would be decided," 24 states and the District of Columbia will already have held presidential primaries. [read post]
10 Aug 2007, 5:02 am
Whether the Supreme Court will be willing to wade into this new debate any time soon may well depend upon its reaction to the coming petition for review in District of Columbia v. [read post]
9 Aug 2007, 8:32 pm
In it, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit highlights differences in the construction of the act by several courts with regard to various types of positions often filled by local hires. -- Clemens Kochinke, Berliner, Corcoran & Rowe, LLP, Washington. [read post]
9 Aug 2007, 5:53 am
Id. at *11 n.19, *14 (dissenting opinion).The en banc Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit said "no" anyway. [read post]
1 Aug 2007, 6:16 pm
On July 18, 2007, the United States District Court for the District of Columbia rejected the United States Government's interpretation of the Treaty of Amity between the United States and Iran, and affirmed an earlier decision allowing American plaintiffs to sue Iran in U.S. courts under Article IV(2) of the Treaty: McKesson Corp. v. [read post]
1 Aug 2007, 6:16 pm
The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals recently ruled in The Ministry of Defense and Support v. [read post]
1 Aug 2007, 6:16 pm
On June 22, 2007, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit confirmed in Hiwot Nemariam et al. v. [read post]
30 Jul 2007, 8:50 am
If it reaches the Court, District of Columbia v. [read post]