Search for: "Wells v. State" Results 1721 - 1740 of 66,431
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Mar 2007, 3:04 pm
That's enough, the Ninth Circuit holds, to immunize the United States, which owned and rented the defective boat, from suit. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 5:37 am by David Canton
A CRTC report suggests that prices and speeds in Canada compare well against other countries. [read post]
17 Jun 2021, 11:44 am by Kevin Kaufman
  The setting of tax rates should be carefully considered when states decide to legalize wagering, as setting rates too high could keep bettors in well-established illicit and untaxed markets. [read post]
6 Jul 2020, 12:59 pm by Vin Bonventre
The state's Appellate Division, Third Department, voted unanimously to deny the Albany Catholic Diocese, as well as other religious groups, an exemption from New York's [read post]
29 Jul 2021, 1:45 pm by Scott Hervey and Josh H. Escovedo
Lawsuits discussed:San Francisco Arts & Athletics, Inc. v United States Olympic CommitteeUSOPC v Puma Watch the video of this episode on YouTube, here. [read post]
28 Jul 2010, 9:27 am by Steven M. Taber
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit on Monday, July 26, 2010, in State of North Carolina v. [read post]
7 Jan 2014, 7:25 pm by Mary Pat Dwyer
McAninch can condemn a state court’s harmless-error decision as “so lacking in justification that there was an error well understood and comprehended in existing law beyond any possibility for fairminded disagreement,” Harrington v. [read post]
18 Dec 2012, 5:30 am by Robichaud
  As well stated by Pamela Karlan in her article in the Boston Review:  In the momentous 1803 case Marbury v. [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 12:48 pm
Supp. 700, 702 (ED Pa. 1957) (“Statutes of Journey’s Account originated in England and have long existed, in varying forms, among the states”).Limitations periods for state law claims fall well within the peculiar province of state sovereign authority. [read post]
18 Feb 2010, 6:08 pm by David Kopel
That book was cited by the Washington Supreme Court in its new decision State v. [read post]
20 Aug 2009, 12:44 pm
Johnson argues that the Eleventh Circuit's decision conflicts with the well-established principle that state legislatures and state courts, rather than federal judges, define the elements of a state criminal offense. [read post]