Search for: "Williams v. Federal District Court"
Results 1721 - 1740
of 3,646
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Feb 2015, 1:57 pm
From early on in Monday’s oral argument in Coleman-Bey v. [read post]
22 Feb 2015, 1:44 pm
Lamb and The Episcopal Church v. [read post]
20 Feb 2015, 12:30 pm
The argument relies on Offutt v. [read post]
18 Feb 2015, 12:23 pm
Williams, 616 F.3d 685, 693 (7th Cir. 2010); United States v. [read post]
17 Feb 2015, 3:00 am
Hoffman v. [read post]
12 Feb 2015, 9:01 pm
That’s Constitutional Law I/Marbury v. [read post]
11 Feb 2015, 8:00 am
According to a federal district court in Virginia, the Circuit’s decision in Badr v. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 6:35 pm
Defense Attorney: William H. [read post]
1 Feb 2015, 10:35 am
Timothy Jost On January 28, 2015, thirty amicus briefs were filed in the Supreme Court supporting the validity of the Internal Revenue Service rule in King v. [read post]
29 Jan 2015, 9:01 pm
In Coleman v. [read post]
27 Jan 2015, 10:16 am
This makes for uncomfortable reading when compared with the claim's choice of court for a jury trial in (II) Jurisdiction and Venue: the court selected is the District Court of the Central District of California Western Division and the claim is oddly silent on why French and German law claims are included, whilst also asserting that the District Court has "original and exclusive jurisdiction over the subject matter of… [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 8:43 pm
Adams, involves a clear violation of the Supreme Court’s decision in Napue [v. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 5:00 am
At Tuesday’s arguments in Williams-Yulee v. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 10:59 am
By William W. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 2:25 am
by Dennis Crouch In Teva v. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 9:28 pm
The Court grounded its decision in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 52(a)(6), which provides that in matters tried to district court, the court's... [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 6:35 am
Whistleblower Protection Act (WPA), but also affirmed the trial court’s ruling that a now-defunct constructive discharge claim notice requirement in D.C. law was inapplicable to the present case regardless of whether the underlying conduct occurred while the notice provision was in effect (Williams v. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 3:29 am
District Judge William H. [read post]
18 Jan 2015, 7:00 am
LEXIS 3289 (D NV, Jan. 12, 2015), a Nevada federal district court adopted a magistrate's recommendations (2014 U.S. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 8:44 am
He was particularly unimpressed by the idea that the review of bankruptcy court decisions by district courts solves any constitutional defect in the bankruptcy judge’s appointment. [read post]
