Search for: "Word v. U. S"
Results 1721 - 1740
of 2,169
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jun 2012, 12:35 pm
If the user is supplying the program with inputs in order to generate the outcome–using the program as a tool, in other words, then it seems quite right that the user would solely own any copyright that results, just like a user of a word-processing program owns the documents he or she writes with it. [read post]
5 Aug 2012, 3:05 pm
Moore, 562 U. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 6:58 am
Butts, 388 U. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 3:36 pm
U. [read post]
3 May 2012, 7:13 am
Board of Education, 333 U.S. 203 (1948) (quoting Thomas Jefferson’s Letter to the Danbury Baptist Association dated Jan. 1, 1802); Reynolds v. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 8:10 am
(Pix (c) Larry Catá Backer 2013)In 2010, the faculty at Penn State Law approved the creation of a new concept course, to be named "Elements of Law". [read post]
18 Jul 2023, 6:12 am
" 209 U. [read post]
11 Sep 2018, 2:20 pm
The court also held that the law, which limited itself to ads for handguns, and only those that were on store premises, was unconstitutionally underinclusive: "[U]nderinclusivity is relevant to Central Hudson's direct advancement prong because it 'may diminish the credibility of the government's rationale for restricting speech in the first place.'" For example, in Pitt News v. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 8:02 am
Zivotofsky v. [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 5:57 am
Maryland, 442 U. [read post]
8 Jul 2024, 4:54 am
The profession would be wise to consider the words of Justice Crespo: “this dispute . . . [read post]
17 Oct 2015, 2:03 pm
And is incoherently applied in the U of Ala. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 6:00 am
The conflicts are most acute when one country’s legal prohibitions on producing data in response to surveillance directives cannot be squared with another country’s legal compulsions to do so. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 9:37 am
[U]nder these rules it is clear that Clobes's lawsuit is barred. [read post]
6 Feb 2007, 7:00 pm
Of course, Fieger had to babelfish Imus's words, because he was speaking to a Detroit audience. [read post]
2 Dec 2022, 11:28 am
Co. v. [read post]
2 Dec 2022, 11:28 am
Co. v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 8:30 am
I predict these stirring words will often be quoted from Roberts's opinion: One can have a government that functions without being ruled by functionaries, and a government that benefits from expertise without being ruled by experts. [read post]
17 Mar 2011, 9:38 am
In today’s case (Hagen v. [read post]
14 Aug 2017, 11:00 am
Kessler v. [read post]
