Search for: "*u.s. v. Rogers"
Results 1741 - 1760
of 1,961
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 May 2009, 5:09 am
Felicia Ponce, a spokeswoman for the U.S. [read post]
9 May 2009, 9:05 am
Gray v. [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 9:31 am
The new ruling in Rasul, et al., v. [read post]
14 Apr 2009, 12:45 pm
See World Market Center Venture, LLC v. [read post]
13 Apr 2009, 5:35 pm
LaValley, a 2002 summa cum laude graduate of Albany Law Review and Editor-in-Chief of the Law Review, was a law clerk for Judge Roger Miner of the U.S. 2d Circuit Court of Appeals and is currently an associate at Boies, Schiller & Flexner. [read post]
2 Apr 2009, 7:26 am
On Monday, the Eleventh Circuit rendered an interesting opinion in the case of King v. [read post]
26 Mar 2009, 6:48 am
Riegel et al. v. [read post]
23 Mar 2009, 11:36 am
In a Wall Street Journal interview with U.S. [read post]
19 Mar 2009, 7:10 pm
"We think the judge's interpretation of the law is in error," Kumpf's attorney Peter Rogers said Thursday. [read post]
19 Mar 2009, 7:16 am
Related posts:Some Significant Forum Non Conveniens Decisions Since Sinochem While the long-term practical effect of Sinochem on the American...When the Forum Conveniens Can Be “Convinced” to Refuse the Case Roger Alford at Opinio juris has an interesting post on...Jurisdiction and Forum Non Conveniens in Quebec In Impulsora Turistica de Occidente v. [read post]
6 Mar 2009, 8:06 am
The ruling in Al Odah v. [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 12:36 pm
Finally, some sanity from the U.S. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 6:37 pm
U.S. [read post]
2 Mar 2009, 4:56 am
Lindor's legal defense in UMG v. [read post]
24 Feb 2009, 10:46 pm
Galazz, 34 FLW 335, 3rd DCA, suspended sentence, standing alone, is an illegal sentence - power to suspend sentence can be exercised only as incident to probation - trial court properly vacated the plea - to render suspended sentence illegal, it would be necessary to add term of probationChen and Fifnje, 34 FLW 339, 2nd DCA, Anticipatory warrant - U.S. v. [read post]
23 Feb 2009, 1:40 pm
Senior U.S. [read post]
18 Feb 2009, 8:20 am
She said the majority’s analysis “is not faithful” to the Supreme Court’s ruling last June in Boumediene v. [read post]
2 Feb 2009, 5:51 pm
2) The most interesting presentation on the first day was from U.S. [read post]
20 Jan 2009, 9:08 am
In Dred Scott v. [read post]
12 Jan 2009, 8:46 pm
(Free Enterprise Fund v. [read post]
