Search for: "A,B,C Insurance Companies" Results 1741 - 1760 of 2,924
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Aug 2012, 7:23 am by J
In fact, the landlord did insure in joint names, and suggested that the leaseholder was sufficient protected by what was termed a "general interest" clause in the insurance. [read post]
5 Aug 2012, 2:35 pm by Mark Zamora
Conway Express, Inc., 261 Ga. 41 (1991); Georgia Power Company v. [read post]
5 Aug 2012, 5:57 am by admin
A simple 16-page illustrated guideline which serves as a basic introduction to parliamentary procedure is the A-B-C’s of Parliamentary Procedure. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 10:11 am by Medicare Set Aside Services
The complaint alleged that these doctors were "billing patients for treatment that was: not (a) clinically indicated; (b) appropriately performed; (c) adequately documented; and/or (d) likely performed. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 1:46 am by Sheppard Mullin
Background Facts and Earlier Proceedings in Harris I In this case, plaintiffs were claims adjusters at insurance companies Liberty Mutual and Golden Eagle. [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 4:34 pm by S2KM Limited
B promises C that he will discharge the debt immediately if C will promise to pay him $1000. [read post]
29 Jul 2012, 7:35 pm by Stan
a) company had duty of care regarding management of the highway in question; b) rainstorm and related problems were foreseeable; c) company was negligent in allowing traffic onto the road given the flooding; and d) company was negligent in not having additional staff on hand to deal with storm-related issues. [read post]
29 Jul 2012, 7:58 am
The “hold harmless” provision relied upon by the District provided that "[t]he Employee agrees that the Employer shall have no liability whatsoever for any loss suffered by the Employee with regard to his [or her] selection of an insurance company or mutual fund, or the solvency of, operation of, or benefits provided by said insurance company or mutual fund company".* The Appellate Division agreed with the District, noting that… [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 9:00 am
One note: A Domestic or Foreign Asset Protection Trust works for most entities -C Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Limited Partnerships -but not necessarily for an S Corporation, since only certain types of trusts can own S Corporation stock. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 1:24 pm by Thomas G. Heintzman
Here are some of the circumstances in which they have been used and applied: (a)  Specifications:  A specification list prepared by the owner was incorporated by reference into the contract ultimately entered into with the contractor, rather than attaching a specification list physically to the actual contract.2 (b)  Specific work and Best Practices:  A term in the main contract specifying the work to be carried out and stating the obligation to use “best trace… [read post]
21 Jul 2012, 8:20 am by Paul Rosenzweig
  About this three things can be noted: a) to the extent a regulatory agency has authority to set mandatory cybersecurity standards already, the provision of voluntary standards in the bill is unnecessary;  b) it also smacks a bit of bait and switch, since the authority to impose mandatory rules will continue; and c) requiring a report when the agency chooses not to act is a strong incentive to make the voluntary rules mandatory and is Congress putting its thumb on the… [read post]