Search for: "A. Jackson"
Results 1741 - 1760
of 27,904
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jun 2023, 8:20 am
[including when the requirement is imposed by antidiscrimination laws, for instance when such laws require web site designers who create opposite-sex wedding sites create same-sex wedding sites.] [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 7:07 am
Have the dissenting opinions (by Justices Sotomayor and Jackson) abandoned the idea that racial diversity in the classroom is supposed to benefit everyone by undermining stereotypes and widening the range of viewpoints? [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 7:02 am
And Justice Kagan issued a dissenting opinion, in which Justices Sotomayor and Jackson joined. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 6:20 am
Here’s the Friday morning read: The Supreme Court Overturns Fifty Years of Precedent on Affirmative Action (Jeannie Suk Gersen, The New Yorker) The Mysterious Case of the Fake Gay Marriage Website, the Real Straight Man, and the Supreme Court (Melissa Gira Grant, The New Republic) With Supreme Court Decision, College Admissions Could Become More Subjective (Anemona Hartocollis, The New York Times) What the Supreme Court’s ruling on affirmative action does and does not do (Piper Hudspeth… [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 3:03 am
But too many Asian students had somehow overcome the legacy of discrimination and, as forcefully argued by Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson in dissent, the Equal Protection Clause were there to remedy discrimination against black students, with no mention of whether Asians deserve equal protection as well. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 12:01 am
I know that Justice Jackson's dissent will win plaudits from progressives, but there is very little actual law in it. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 9:15 pm
And Justice Jackson, in a separate dissent in the UNC case, contended that the university “more accurately assesses” merit by accounting for race in its admissions decisions. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 5:30 pm
"JUSTICE JACKSON’s race-infused world view falls flat at each step.... [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 3:16 pm
Thankfully, Justice Jackson in particular did highlight some of those benefits. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 2:39 pm
In a fiery dissent, Justice Sonia Sotomayor, joined by the court’s other liberals, Elena Kagan and Ketanji Brown Jackson, said the opinion “rolls back decades of precedent and momentous progress. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 2:28 pm
” And Josh Gerstein of Politico reports that “Clarence Thomas, Ketanji Brown Jackson air sharp disagreement on race in America; Thomas accused Jackson of promoting a ‘race-infused world view’; Jackson said Thomas was ignoring the facts. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 1:34 pm
The crudeness of the racial and ethnic categories used by Harvard and UNC also undercut Justice Jackson's otherwise powerful appeal to the historic disadvantages faced by African-Americans. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 1:32 pm
Justice Sonia Sotomayor wrote a concurring opinion, which was joined by Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 1:24 pm
Read In Their Own Words . . . .Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson at constantinecannon.com [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 12:55 pm
Justice Jackson dissent was related to the North Carolina case. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 10:29 am
If you have questions as to whether an H-1B amended petition is necessary, please reach out to your Jackson Lewis attorney. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 10:15 am
Justice Alito authored the opinion for the Court and Justices Jackson and Sotomayor each filed concurring opinions—though Sotomayor’s concurrence reads more like a dissent. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 10:15 am
Justice Alito authored the opinion for the Court and Justices Jackson and Sotomayor each filed concurring opinions—though Sotomayor’s concurrence reads more like a dissent. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 9:31 am
Justice Sonia Sotomayor – a graduate of Princeton and Yale Law School who once called herself “the perfect affirmative action baby” – dissented, in an opinion that was joined by Justices Elena Kagan and Ketanji Brown Jackson. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 7:49 am
On June 29, 2023 the Supreme Court held that colleges and universities making "admission decisions" that relied, in part, on racial considerations violated the Constitution of the United States. [read post]
