Search for: "AC v. State"
Results 1741 - 1760
of 1,882
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Feb 2009, 1:10 am
Co. v. [read post]
16 Feb 2009, 1:10 am
Co. v. [read post]
16 Feb 2009, 1:10 am
Co. v. [read post]
26 Jan 2009, 8:11 pm
Tire Stores Inc. v. [read post]
19 Jan 2009, 1:52 am
This is consistent with the approach to art 39 adopted by Lord Browne Wilkinson and Lord Goff of Chieveley in the House of Lords in R v Bow Street Metropolitan Stipendiary Magistrate; Ex parte Pinochet Ugarte [No 3] [2000] 1 AC 147; [1999] UKHL 17. [read post]
18 Jan 2009, 7:25 pm
In C.M. v. [read post]
16 Jan 2009, 8:19 am
Alliance Data Systems Corp. v. [read post]
15 Jan 2009, 8:58 am
., Monroe County, AC-14386-08). [read post]
11 Jan 2009, 7:00 am
” If he lives in the USA he may be aware that the original and authoritative and therefore binding (including upon the Supreme Court itself) Supreme Court precedent Worcester v. [read post]
29 Dec 2008, 5:48 am
As Lord Scarman said in R v Home Secretary ex p. [read post]
23 Dec 2008, 6:22 am
Natale v. [read post]
23 Dec 2008, 6:22 am
Natale v. [read post]
21 Dec 2008, 1:31 pm
Held: R (Awua) v Brent London Borough Council [1996] AC 55 suggests that where temporary accommodation is unreasonable for the person to remain in, they again become homeless. [read post]
13 Dec 2008, 2:26 pm
United States v. [read post]
23 Nov 2008, 10:32 pm
What puzzles me slightly, particularly given the stated aim of consistency, is the difference in approach to that of Boss Holdings Ltd v Grosvenor West End Properties Ltd [2008] 1 WLR 289 (which I briefly discussed here). [read post]
20 Nov 2008, 12:30 pm
The offense to which he had pleaded guilty: filing false income tax returns using confidential ACS client information to fraudulently claim entitlement to state and local tax credits.The Appellate Division said: "We find that the arbitrator's award, which determined that while grievant had engaged in a censurable course of conduct that justified punishment he should be restored to his supervisory position at ACS, is irrational and defies common sense. [read post]
18 Nov 2008, 9:34 am
Lucian's lawyer (Michael Barry, who shared a panel with me at ACS this summer) argued that "Section 14a-8 provides the minimum of what has to go in a proxy statement, not the maximum. [read post]
3 Nov 2008, 6:11 pm
In Emma Murray v. [read post]
3 Nov 2008, 7:30 am
Ace Am. [read post]
1 Nov 2008, 3:12 am
(IPKat) United States US General 2005 civil damages awards in state courts rarely broke $1M according to report released by US Justice Department (Law360) Changes to expert witness rules draws critisism (Law360) Collaborative law and intellectual property cases (The IP ADR Blog) Democrats victory could mean a new focus on civil suits (Law360) Election could drastically affect appeals court makeup (Law360) Ethics case survey: when is attorney-client privilege waived? [read post]
