Search for: "American Federation of Government Employees v. United States"
Results 1741 - 1760
of 1,887
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Aug 2009, 5:46 pm
Modification of Retiree Benefits is Governed by 11 U.S.C. [read post]
13 Aug 2009, 2:14 am
Ian Boyko, Canadian Federation of Students Expand fair dealing in line with the case of CHH v. [read post]
12 Aug 2009, 2:30 pm
United States, 312 F.2d 418 (Ct. [read post]
28 Jul 2009, 6:25 am
On June 24, 2009, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit decided the case of Warfield v. [read post]
22 Jul 2009, 2:19 pm
Elsewhere in Washington, D.C., the United States Senate has also weighed in in favor of E-Verify. [read post]
18 Jul 2009, 7:31 am
The financial crisis, the new administration, new SEC leadership, increased funding and the focus of Congress and the media have all combined to encourage heightened government scrutiny. [read post]
14 Jul 2009, 6:37 am
It is the finest bench, pound for pound in the United States. [read post]
10 Jul 2009, 3:39 pm
And not only that, but there is a 1988 federal United States Supreme Court case, Volkswagenwerk Aktiengesellschaft v. [read post]
6 Jul 2009, 10:43 pm
Hartford is guarding against employee and client defections after three consecutive quarterly losses depleted capital and a $3.4 billion U.S. bailout raised the prospect of government- imposed compensation curbs. [read post]
5 Jul 2009, 5:01 pm
Raich (Commerce Clause, powers of Congress and the federal government: federal U.S. authority permits prohibition of state-allowed local cultivation of marijuana)545 U.S. 1; 125 S. [read post]
1 Jul 2009, 12:38 am
The National Law Journal
The Supreme Court's unusual order Monday delaying a decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 2:59 pm
Sec. 1341 and 1346), the government must prove that the defendant violated a disclosure duty imposed by state law. [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 6:17 pm
Indian tribes are dependent on, and subordinate to the federal government, yet retain powers of selfgovernment. [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 5:19 pm
Obama, President of the United States, et al. [read post]
5 Jun 2009, 5:00 am
(1709 Copyright Blog) (Out-Law) EU may flex regulatory muscle against Google Books deal (Ars Technica) (1709 Copyright Blog) 2009 Directive on legal protection of computer programs in force (Out-Law) European Greens want to legalise file-sharing (TorrentFreak) Germany Federal Minister of Justice against Google Book Search (Lenz Blog) Netherlands Mininova and BREIN clash in court to determine whether the BitTorrent indexer has to actively filter torrents from the site… [read post]
5 Jun 2009, 5:00 am
(1709 Copyright Blog) (Out-Law) EU may flex regulatory muscle against Google Books deal (Ars Technica) (1709 Copyright Blog) 2009 Directive on legal protection of computer programs in force (Out-Law) European Greens want to legalise file-sharing (TorrentFreak) Germany Federal Minister of Justice against Google Book Search (Lenz Blog) Netherlands Mininova and BREIN clash in court to determine whether the BitTorrent indexer has to actively filter torrents from the site… [read post]
29 May 2009, 1:53 pm
More specifically, the ADAA rejects the holdings by the United States Supreme Court in Sutton v. [read post]
29 May 2009, 1:53 pm
More specifically, the ADAA rejects the holdings by the United States Supreme Court in Sutton v. [read post]
24 May 2009, 6:47 pm
I am primarily supportive of these laws because they allow the government to make an important statement about the nation's values, which I suspect many Americans believe should include disapproval of all forms of violence, including hate crimes.In the abortion context, conservatives have argued -- and the Supreme Court has agreed -- that Roe v. [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:24 am
’ (China Law Blog) Europe ECJ finds similar marks on wine and glasses not likely to cause confusion: Waterford Wedgewood plc v Assembled Investments (Proprietary) Ltd, OHIM (Class 46) (IPKat) AG Colomer opines in Maple leaf trade mark battle: joined cases American Clothing Associates SA v OHIM and OHIM v American Clothing Associates SA (IPKat) (Excess Copyright) CFI: Restitutio and time limits: how does the law stand now for CTMs? [read post]
