Search for: "BAKER V. STATE" Results 1741 - 1760 of 3,489
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Oct 2014, 4:10 am by Howard Friedman
Garcia-Padilla, (D PR, Oct. 21, 2014), the court held that the Supreme Court's 1972 summary dismissal for want of  a substantial federal question in Baker v. [read post]
21 Oct 2014, 7:21 pm by Lyle Denniston
Judge Perez-Gimenez focused the first part of his constitutional analysis on the Supreme Court’s summary ruling in Baker v. [read post]
21 Oct 2014, 4:47 pm
Nelson in 1972, a view that has been rejected by every other federal court since United States v. [read post]
18 Oct 2014, 6:54 am by Benjamin Bissell
” Lauren Bateman provided a blow-by-blow readout of the hearing on the Department of Justice’s state secrets claim in Restis v. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Opponents of same-sex marriage sometimes point to the 1972 case of Baker v. [read post]
11 Oct 2014, 6:55 am by Benjamin Bissell
Jane announced that the Fourth Circuit affirmed the 2012 refusal to vacate the sentence in the United States v. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 8:51 am by Eric Goldman
Cf. the old Jake Baker case. * Citizens Action Coalition of Indiana, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 8:46 am by John Elwood
Take a swig of some good strong coffee because we’ve got a baker’s dozen first-time relists to get through before you pass out/return to your regularly scheduled programming. [read post]
8 Oct 2014, 8:56 am
The relatively painless resolution Sutton seemed to favor at oral argument on August 6, ruling that the one-sentence rejection of a same-sex marriage case in 1972′s Baker v. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 1:16 pm by Dale Carpenter
Under this approach, the Sixth Circuit would consider itself bound by the one-sentence order in 1972’s Baker v. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 9:23 am by Neil Siegel
What I did not mention there is that it now seems harder for the Sixth Circuit to uphold state bans based upon the authority of Baker v. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 6:00 am by Trevor Cutaiar
Baker, 554 U.S. 471 (2008), only addressed the narrow issue of whether punitive damages were preempted by the Clean Water Act and that this narrowness accounted for the Court’s need in Atlantic Sounding Co. v. [read post]
4 Oct 2014, 6:50 am by Benjamin Bissell
Ben noted Diane Webber’s account of the European Court of Human Rights’ decision in Hassan v. [read post]
2 Oct 2014, 10:04 am by Lyle Denniston
Abercrombie & Fitch Stores — scope of the legal duty of a company under the federal law banning workplace discrimination based on a worker or job applicant’s religion Baker Botts, L.L.P. v. [read post]
2 Oct 2014, 8:11 am by Doorey
Dishonest Texts Can Create All Sorts of Legal Problems In the second decision (Baker v. [read post]