Search for: "Bush v. United States"
Results 1741 - 1760
of 2,562
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Nov 2008, 5:54 pm
They want to stay in the United States. [read post]
2 Dec 2018, 8:23 am
President Bush was acting in accordance with the United Nations Charter and his foreign affairs authority. [read post]
3 Apr 2018, 1:01 am
Justice Anthony Kennedy In Boumediene et al. v. [read post]
12 Dec 2007, 7:36 am
This Guide was compiled by United Cerebral Palsy. [read post]
22 Sep 2015, 9:01 pm
As I explained in an earlier Verdict column, under the most natural reading of both the text of the Fourteenth Amendment and the leading case construing it—the 1898 ruling in United States v. [read post]
10 Sep 2011, 3:00 am
Today, National Stepfamily Day is celebrated in all 50 states, Canada, and the United Kingdom. [read post]
30 Apr 2020, 9:59 am
Texas, 18-9674, and United States v. [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 2:40 pm
Supp. 51 (D.D.C. 1973) (holding that the $10,000 jurisdictional amount in controversy requirement then in the statute (it's since been eliminated) was not satisfied); United States v. [read post]
9 Dec 2007, 3:40 pm
., v. [read post]
8 Apr 2007, 4:17 am
Further, that an administration headed by two men who had "had other priorities" than to risk their own lives when their turn to fight for their country came up, should brand as a threat to the United States a person who did not run away but stood up and fought for his country and was wounded in battle, goes beyond the outrageous. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 3:30 am
§ 3162(a)(2); United States v. [read post]
22 Oct 2009, 1:28 pm
State v. [read post]
21 Apr 2008, 11:52 am
" Consequently, a state drug offense punishable by more than one year qualifies as a "felony drug offense," even if state law classifies the offense as a misdemeanor. [read post]
26 Oct 2007, 9:35 pm
Circuit case of Price v. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 3:19 pm
United States. [read post]
14 May 2012, 9:39 am
In 2009, a judge in New York dismissed the suit on the grounds that the ACLU's clients — coalition of attorneys and human rights, labor, legal and media organizations whose work requires them to engage in sensitive and sometimes privileged telephone and e-mail communications with individuals located outside the United States — couldn't prove that their communications would be monitored under the new law. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 6:50 am
We only have to look back to Bush v. [read post]
20 Oct 2020, 4:18 am
Historically, it is an accurate description of public square free speech issues in the United States from the 1950’s until today. [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 5:11 pm
” Even “more critically,” he added, “no court should be able to order than an alien captured and detained abroad during wartime be admitted and released into the United States. [read post]
20 Aug 2007, 5:00 am
Nevertheless, as we now know, the Administration was quite willing to fire United States Attorneys who did not show themselves to be "loyal Bushies. [read post]
